In this episode of The Original Torah Pearls, Chukat (Numbers 19:1-22:1), we discuss, is there a red heifer in Israel? What is the water of menstruation for cleansing? Does a corrupt priesthood invalidate the water of purification and are we cut off without it? Is the site of the Temple off limits today? What exactly did Moses do wrong when Yehovah brought water from the rock? How did the snake on the pole cross the line into idolatry?
I look forward to reading your comments!
You are listening to The Original Torah Pearls with Nehemia Gordon, Keith Johnson, and Jono Vandor. Thank you for supporting Nehemia Gordon's Makor Hebrew Foundation. Learn more at NehemiasWall.com.
Jono: Yehovah, we pray that you would open our eyes that we may see the wondrous things of your Torah. Amen.
Keith: Amen.
Nehemia: Amen.
Keith: Amen.
Jono: Gโday to Abraham and Elisabeth and their children Abraham, Ana, Ava, and Chasya, who commented saying, โThank you so much for these Torah portions that you put on for free download. We are very thankful to be able to listen here in Mexico.โ So gโday to you. And wherever you may be around the world, thank you for company. It is time for Pearls from the Torah Portion with Keith Johnson and Nehemia Gordon. Gโday, fellows.
Keith: Hey.
Nehemia: Gโday.
Keith: How are you?
Nehemia: Great to be here. I want to do a shout-out to Eddie in Palm Beach, Florida, whoโs been listening from the beginning. Thank you for sharing it now with people on Facebook. And also, a shout-out to Oloyede, and I may be mispronouncing that name, Oloyede in Costa Rica.
Jono: Costa Rica?
Nehemia: Jacรณ, Costa Rica. Thank you for listening and keep sharing.
Keith: Let me say this – you know, I canโt get over this, guys. I canโt get over this, for those that are listening that are in different parts of the world, I want to tell you, I just get so… Iโm humbled that youโve taken the time to do this. This is such fulfillment to see the Torah going forth around the world. Iโm just really, really blessed. A special shout-out to everyone.
Jono: Keith, let me read it to you once again because I love doing this, everybody listening in the States, of course, Canada, Australia, Mexico, Israel, South Africa, United Kingdom, Columbia, Argentina, Philippines, Venezuela, Brazil, Costa Rica, Chile, Spain, Netherlands, Germany, Serbia, India, and New Zealand, and everywhere else. There you go.
Keith: Thatโs almost 20 countries, are you kidding me?
Nehemia: Itโs ridiculous.
Jono: Hey, listen, itโs wonderful to have everybody listening, and I pray that it continues to be a blessing. Now, today we are in Chukat. Have I pronounced that right? Chukat?
Nehemia: Chukat, you got it.
Jono: Beautiful. Numbers 19, verse 1, to 22 verse 1. And it begins like this, you ready?
Keith: Yes.
Jono: โNow Yehovah spoke to Moses and Aaron, saying, โThis is the ordinance of the law which Yehovah has commanded, saying: Speak to the children of Israel, that they bring you a red heifer without blemish, in which there is no defect and on which a yoke has never come.โโ Now, I know this discussion could go on and onโฆ Nehemia?
Nehemia: Yeah.
Jono: Is there a red heifer in Israel?
Nehemia: Well, thatโs an interesting question. So, it says here that thereโs no blemish in it, and the Rabbis take that to mean that itโs all red and it doesnโt have two hairs that arenโt red. In other words, every single hair is red with maybe the exception of one hair, and so thatโs a very rare thing. But I donโt think the Torah is actually saying it has to be 100% red; if it has a white spot here-and-there I donโt think thatโs the issue. So, a red heifer – thatโs probably a pretty common thing. There are entire species of cows that are red.
Jono: Sure.
Nehemia: So, thereโs got to be lots of red heifers.
Keith: I want to say this, I found a red heifer and I was going to bring it to the Rabbis when I was in Israel, and I heard all this about the perfection of the red heifer. But if theyโre waiting for that, they ainโt finding that. That exists in Israel, Iโve seen it. Nehemia showed me the red heifer.
Jono: Youโve seen the red heifer in Israel? Okay.
Nehemia: Well, look, so the issue isnโt the red heifer, itโs what we read later on in the section where it talks about, we need a priest who is clean. Actually, through the ritual of the red heifer, he becomes ritually unclean; he starts out ritually clean, and we donโt have that. The challenge is to get someone who is a legitimate priest, who we can prove is a legitimate priest, who we know is ritually clean. It becomes a catch-22 because once you ever touch a dead body, even touch a grave, as weโll see, you become ritually unclean forever until youโre sprinkled with the waters of the red heifer, this solution of the red heifer. And if you donโt have the solution of the red heifer, how do you get clean in the first place?
Jono: Thatโs right.
Nehemia: So, it creates a catch-22. There are lots of red heifers in Israel today, but these waters of the red heifer we donโt have today, that hasnโt been created.
Keith: And let me tell you guys this – this is whatโs so exciting, and I want to just… I donโt want to leave the farm, but I want to say something. This is whatโs so exciting to me when I read Torah and I hear about these things, and I hear about these requirements, and I hear about these regulations. And then I think about the author. The one who came up with them, and would there ever be a requirement or a regulation which could not be fulfilled? And I would say no, there is no such requirement or such regulation that could not be fulfilled.
And this is why Iโm going to shout. What excites me is that He already knows. He already knows who that high priest, who that one that comes in the line of Aaron is. He already knows when He decides to set up his kingdom and the redemption is here that this is not going to be an issue of, โwhat are we going to do now? Well, we donโt know what to do, whoโs it going to be?โ
Itโs just like, you guys, I donโt even want to get into theology. I just want to talk about the practical side of our Creator in heaven who put these things in place, who knew then that there would be the requirement that would be met. And when we read, we find out that this is exactly what happens, and He knows in the future that that requirement will be met. I mean, doesnโt that excite you guys? I mean it just is amazing to me. I mean itโs not like Heโs up there thinking, โOh, geez, I canโt find a red heiferโฆโ
Jono: No, thatโs…
Keith: โWho am I going to have?โ
Jono: Itโs all overโฆ
Keith: โWhat am I going to do?โ
Jono: โฆitโs finished.
Keith: I mean, you know, thereโs no – are you kidding me?
Jono: I had a great plan but itโs over now.
Keith: Yeah.
Jono: Actually, you know whatโฆ
Keith: โRetzonha ihiye asui,โ His will shall be done. This is not some far off thing thatโll never be done. No, Heโs going to do it.
Jono: Amen.
Keith: Thatโs just amazing. Iโm just starting off the portion a little excited; I better come down a little bit here.
Jono: Okay. Listen, itโs got me thinking, so Nehemia, when did the priest… I mean we understand that the priesthood obviously comes from Aaron and then through, as weโre going to see, through Eleazar, right?
Nehemia: Eleazar. There are two names in ancient Hebrew: Eliezer…
Jono: And Eleazar.
Nehemia: โฆwho is the servant of Abraham, Eliezer, and thereโs Eleazar…
Jono: Yes. Eleazar.
Nehemia: โฆwho is the son of Aaron.
Jono: Thank you for that. When did the high priesthood become corrupt? When did the waters of purification no longer count?
Nehemia: Those are two separate questions. They mustโve had the waters of purification in the Second Temple. I guess after that, it ceased to exist. And weโve really all been in the state of ritual impurity, collectively, since then.
Jono: Well, my question is: was the Second Templeโฆ did it have a high priesthood? Did it have a priesthood that came from the line of Eleazar?
Nehemia: They may have come from the line of Eleazar but they definitelyโฆ in addition to that, youโve got the line of Tzadok, or Zadok, who is the high priest in the Temple at the time of Solomon. What happened is that we had this king of Judea appointed by the Romans, whose name was Herod. Herod was actually the descendant of Edomites who had been forcibly converted to Judaism, and so to give himself more legitimacy he married into the family of these respectable priests. He deposed the legitimate high priest, who was a direct descendant of Zadok, and installed his father-in-law, whose name was Boethus, or in Hebrew, Bithus, and thatโs where we get the Boethusians. Actually, in the New Testament youโll have references to the Herodian priests, and that was a derogatory name for the Boethusians, who were these usurper priests who were installed by Herod. So really from the time of Herod you no longer have anything even resembling a legitimate priesthood.
Jono: So, the Herodian dynasty corrupted the priesthood; thatโs what youโre saying in a nutshell?
Nehemia: Absolutely. They deposed the line of high priests that were legitimate high priests going directly back to Zadok. Those legitimate priests are actually mentioned in the Book of Ezekiel – theyโre foretold as the sons of Zadok who remained loyal to Me when the rest of the people went astray. Then Herod deposed them and installed his own, literally, his father-in-law. After that, almost every year there was a different high priest that was installed by the Romans, or installed through some other corrupt means.
So basically, throughout the entire, Iโd say, last hundred years or so of the Temple, you had people who are Kohanim – they were direct descendants from Aaron but they werenโt descended from Zadok, from Tzadok, and they were Boethusians, they were illegitimate priests.
Can I actually mention this story? I want to play a card. Iโve mentioned this story before and I actually looked it up and translated it. Itโs a story that takes place… itโs actually in the first century, and it takes place when a Rabbi named Yohanan ben Zakkai, who was a leading Rabbi at the end of the first century, when heโs approached by a certain idolater, and actually it literally says, โa worshipper of stars.โ
Anyway, this story takes place when this idolater asks Rabbi Yohanan ben Zakkai, โWhat about this red heifer thing? What is this about?โ And it gives some interesting perspective, so Iโm going to read this story. It appears in some ancient rabbinical sources, one of them is in the Midrash Tanhuma on this section, commenting on the Book of Numbers, chapter 19.
So it says, as follows, โa certain idolater asks Rabbi Yohanan ben Zakkai, โthese things that you do seem like a type of magic: you bring the heifer, you burn it, you grind it up, and you take its ashes; you then sprinkle two or three drops on one of you who is unclean from touching the dead and you proclaim him clean.โ Rabbi Yohanan asked: โHave you ever seen someone possessed by an epileptic spirit?โ โYes,โ the idolater replied. โAnd what do you do for him?โ The idolater answered, โWe bring roots and make them smoke underneath him, we then sprinkle water on the spirit, and it flees.โ Rabbi Yohanan said, โLet your ears hear what your mouth speaks. This spirit is a spirit of uncleanness, as it is written.โ And then he quotes a verse from Zechariah chapter 13, verse 2, which says, โAnd also the prophets and the spirit of uncleanness will I remove from the earth.โ Then Rabbi Yohanan goes on to explain, โWe sprinkle the waters of purification upon the spirit and it flees.โ When the idolater left, Rabbi Yohananโs disciples asked him, โyou drove him away with a reed,โ meaning you got rid of him, โbut what will you say to us?โ Rabbi Yohanan replied, โI swear by your lives that the dead do not make unclean and the water does not make clean. Rather, it is a decree of the King of Kings, the holy one, blessed be He, saidโฆโ
Keith: Hold on. Hold on. Come on, now.
Nehemia: โโฆI have established a statute for you, decreed a decree, and you are not permitted to violate my decree as it is written,โ and in quotes this verse, โThis is the statute of the instruction.โ Thatโs actually the literal translation here in Numbers 19:2.
Keith: Amen.
Nehemia: The point is, when heโs talking to the idolater, heโs got to explain it in the idolaterโs terms.
Keith: Yes.
Nehemia: The idolaterโs looking at what heโs doing and heโs saying this looks like magic, so the Rabbi says, well, look, in our world today everyone knows that there are epileptic spirits, and what do you do for an epileptic spirit? You go through some kind of ritual and you sprinkle water and it runs away. Thatโs what our red heifer is – itโs getting rid of an epileptic spirit. The disciples hear this and theyโre shocked because theyโre like, โwell, thatโs not what we do for an epileptic spirit, thatโs the thing that sounds like magic.โ
And so, when the idolater leaves, then Rabbi Yohanan explains what the story really is, which is that Yehovah commanded these things, we do them. Is there anything inherently about a dead person that makes us unclean? Of course not. Itโs not that thereโs some spirit that transfers from the dead person to us, some mystical force. This is what the Creator commanded, and so we follow these commandments in order to preserve His instructions.
Keith: Amen.
Nehemia: To live according to His word. And itโs all about Him, itโs not about some spirits that weโre trying to drive out or anything like that.
Keith: Amen.
Jono: There it is. โThen a man who is clean shall gather up the ashes of the heifer, and store them outside the camp in a clean place; and they shall be kept for the congregation of the children of Israel for the water of purificationโฆโ
Keith: Yes, sir.
Jono: โโฆit is for purifying from sin.โ
Nehemia: Whoa. Weโve got to stop there. What do you have there, Keith, at the end of verse 9, โit is for purification from sinโ? Are you kidding me?
Keith: Letโs see here, Iโm sorry, โโฆceremonially clean place outside the camp. They are to be kept by the Israelite community for use in the water of cleansing; it is for the purification from sin.โ
Nehemia: Wow. Alright. This just…
Jono: Okay. Alright. Now, Nehemia, before you…
Nehemia: But it doesnโt say that.
Jono: I know it doesnโt say – you know what Iโve got?
Nehemia: What have you got?
Jono: Keith?
Nehemia: Youโve got an asterisk?
Jono: Iโve got an asterisk here.
Keith: Oh-oh, here comes the New King James version.
Jono: And of course, it says at the bottom, โliterally, impurityโ. How do you go from purity to impurity? Nehemia, what do you have?
Nehemia: So first of all, itโs called, โmei niddah,โ and โniddahโ isโฆ thatโs the word that we read about in Leviticus 15. I guess you could actually translate this as โwaters of menstruation,โ if you really want to be literal here.
Jono: Wow.
Nehemia: Thereโs kind of a paradox in this water. Itโs the ashes of the red heifer, we mix it with water, we mix it with all kinds of things. In verse 6 one of the ingredients, literally, itโs called crimson worm; itโs a dye. So, the water wouldโve actually been red, even though the heifer is burnt, and even though it was red, itโs not red anymore; itโs ash color. But the water wouldโve been red because of the crimson worm. So, the paradox here is that the people who are sprinkled with the water of the red heifer or touch it, even during the preparation of it, they become ritually unclean.
Keith: Right.
Nehemia: At the same time, it makes clean, but also makes unclean. So, itโs a paradox. And this is an example where something is so holy that it actually conveys uncleanness. Again, I think the story of Rabbi Yohanan says it all – โthis is what Yehovah said.โ I donโt think thereโs anything inherently unclean about this water; itโs a heifer, itโs an animal and you did this ritual. These are the instructions that God commanded, but its status is so holy that it actually conveys uncleanness before it then makes clean.
Literally it says, โthe waters of menstruation, it is a hatatโ. Now โhatathโ can mean a sin offering, but in this context โhatathโ can also mean the removal of sin, with the pi-el conjugation, itโs the removal of sin, and therefore, cleansing. I would say thatโs a more accurate translation here because, throughout the passage we have this phrase โlehateh,โ โlehithatah,โ which is to sprinkle with the water and hence, purify through the water; to make clean with the water.
So, I would translate this, โthe waters of uncleanness,โ or literally, menstruation; it is a purification. And just to pull up here, the Jewish Publication Society, JPS, has โa man who is clean shall gather up the ashes of the cow, and deposit them outside the camp in a clean place to be shall be kept for water of lustration.โ Water of lustration? See, they use a big word there, which who knows what that means, โwater of lustration for the Israelite community; it is cleansing.โ So โit is cleansingโ is, essentiallyโฆthatโs a more accurate translation, I would say.
Jono: How about that?
Keith: Thatโs amazing.
Nehemia: Okay. Soโฆ
Jono: Nehemia?
Nehemia: Okay. So, weโve got in the JPS โthe water of lustration.โ I looked up โlustrationโ and it just means to purify the means of religious ritual or ceremony.โ So, lustration is just a fancy word for purification. I donโt know what they accomplished by using the phrase โwaters of lustration,โ as opposed to โwaters of purificationโ.
Jono: But think of it, we learned a new word and…
Nehemia: But literallyโฆ yeah, learned a new word, although according to Wikipedia, the great source of knowledge – people, you canโt trust Wikipedia because literally anybody can go into Wikipedia and change it. But according to Wikipedia, lustration is the government process regulating the participation of former communists, especially of informants of the communist secret police.โ
Jono: What?
Nehemia: Pretty sure thatโs not what the Book of Numbers is talking about, though.
Jono: No probably not. Okay. Shall we? โWhoever touches the body of anyone who has died, and does not purify himself, defiles the Tabernacle of Yehovah. That person shall be cut off from Israel. He shall be unclean, because the water of purification was not sprinkled on him; his uncleanness is still on him.โ
Nehemia: Now based on what you just read, Iโm cut off and youโre cut off and Keith is never connected, so heโs… no, Iโm just kidding. Keithโs cut offโฆ
Keith: What?
Nehemia: No, youโve got the whole Isaiah 56 thing going on, but you werenโt sprinkled with the waters of purification, right? I mean…
Keith: Right.
Nehemia: Is that not what it says?
Jono: Thatโs what it says.
Nehemia: If you become ritually unclean from the dead and you donโt get sprinkled with the waters of purification, youโre cut off. Now, what does your translation have, Keith?
Keith: โWhoever touches the dead body and anyone who fails to purify himself defiles the LORDโs Tabernacle that person must be cut off from Israel; because the water of cleansing has not been sprinkled on him, he is unclean. His uncleanness remains on him.โ
Nehemia: Okay, thatโs one way of reading the verse, and itโs a legitimate way of reading the verse. But what it means is that the very act of not purifying yourself is a desecration of Godโs Tabernacle. Is that how it sounds to you? I mean, are you with me guys?
I looked up in every Jewish commentator I could find to see what the opinions were, and they all agreed that thatโs a misreading of the verse. The more accurate way to read the verse would be โanyone who touches a dead body from the soul of a man,โ thatโs literally what it says, โhe shall die and will not be sprinkled, having made unclean the Tabernacle of Yehovah, that soul is cut off from Israel.โ In other words, if you donโt walk into the Tabernacle in that state of uncleanness then youโre not cut off. You see the difference between what you read and what I read?
Jono: Sure. Itโs incredible.
Nehemia: Itโs actually a significant difference. In Hebrew, itโs a very slight difference of interpretation here. To me itโs obvious that this has to be that; it doesnโt make sense to me that a person would be cut off simply for not being able to… I mean, letโs say we have somebody up in the Galilee whoโs a dayโs walk from Jerusalem, maybe two days walk, depending on the season. And youโre telling me heโs got to bury his father and then get down to Jerusalem to be sprinkled with the waters of the red heifer? Does that even make any sense? It doesnโt to me. Thereโs an interesting story – extend me a little bit of grace here, and let me go over into your realm for a minute, can we do that?
Keith: Wait, wait, no, no, just a second…
Jono: You want to go back into the New Testament?
Keith: If you want to go into the New Testament, Iโm going to have to take a coffee break, ladies and gentlemen.
Nehemia: So, yeah, letโs pop overโฆI believe itโs Acts chapter 21, and the reason Iโm bringing this isโฆyou know, look, everybody knows who listens to this program, Iโm not Messianic, Iโm not Christian; New Testament isnโt my Scripture. Iโm looking at this as a historical source of what Jews did in the first century. And there we actually have…
Keith: Can I get an Amen?
Jono: Amen.
Nehemia: Amen. There we have an example where somebody goes through a process of purification, and thatโs Paul of Tarsus, whoโs a disciple of a Rabbi named Gamliel or Gamaliel. Where is this, I believe itโs like verse 26, โThen Paul took the men and the next day, purifying himselfโฆโ. Say, purifying himself…
Jono: Purifying himself.
Nehemia: โโฆwith them, entered into the temple to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification until an offering should be offered for every one of them.โ So, what are the days of purification? We know there are seven days. โAnd when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews, which were of Asia, when they saw him in the Temple, stirred up all the people and laid hands on him.โ So, heโs going through this seven-day process of purification, heโs being sprinkled on the third day, and then heโs going to the Temple to be sprinkled on the seventh day, and thatโs when the whole ruckus happens, on the seventh day. But heโs going through this exact process described in Numbers 19. So, you asked, when did they stop doing this? Here we have a historical source telling us they were still doing this sometime around 40 CE or AD, which is when Paul wouldโve been here in Jerusalem being purified through this seven-day process.
Jono: Okay. So, look, now… let me get this straight.
Keith: Wait, no, no, not again. No, no, sorry, Iโm not letting him off the hook. So Nehemia?
Nehemia: Yes.
Keith: So, youโre telling me that Paul – this was what, how many years after the death of Yeshua?
Nehemia: I thought Paul was like around 40 or 50. Am I wrong about that?
Keith: Exactly. Yeah, no, youโre right. Youโre right.
Jono: Okay.
Nehemia: I know itโs 10-15 years. I mean we donโt know exactly, but something like 10-15 years.
Keith: So, 10-15 years, and heโs already had his road to Damascus, and Iโm not trying to have a New Testament study, heโs had his experience on the road, and yet he went through his process of purification in the Temple.
Nehemia: Right, he did.
Keith: Okay.
Jono: But, Keith, let just say…
Nehemia: I mean itโs in your book.
Jono: If the waters of purificationโฆNehemia, it has to be applied by the high priest, right?
Nehemia: No, it doesnโt say that.
Jono: It doesnโt?
Nehemia: No. Where does it say that? Look, every time somebody became ritually impure they didnโt take another red heifer; they mightโve done this once a centuryโฆ
Jono: Sure.
Nehemia: โฆand just kept adding water. The high priest wouldโve been involved in preparing it. But every time they sprinkled it, I donโt think it wouldโve been the high priest; it wouldโve been any priest, I think, probably.
Jono: Okay. But the high priest wouldโve been involved in preparing it, right? Is that what you said?
Nehemia: Well, look, it says Eleazar the priest and so…
Jono: It does.
Nehemia: โฆat this time, heโs actually the deputy high priest; heโs not the higher priest.
Jono: Okay. Soโฆ
Nehemia: Because Aaron dies later in the chapter, if we ever get to that.
Jono: Thatโs true.
Nehemia: Or later in the Torah portion.
Jono: Okay. So, it doesnโt even necessarily have to be prepared by the high priest. My point is that if, as we established before, the high priesthood was corrupt, that just raises some questions thatโs all. But itโs not necessarily, it doesnโt have to be the case. Okay.
Nehemia: Well, even if the high priest is corrupt, it doesnโt mean that all the rituals heโs doing are invalid; it just means heโs a bad person. Thereโs actually a story that I was taught – and I donโt know if this is historical or not, but itโs certainly taught in legend – that in the last 80 years or so of the Temple, every single year when the priest would go in on Yom Kippur into the Holy of Holies, he would die. They actually got to the point where they had a problem; no one else can go in. So, if he dies, what do you do? They started tying a rope to him, and he would leave the rope outside the Holy of Holies. It would be tied to him and every single year, for 80 years or so, he would die, and they would pull his dead body out.
Jono: Drag him out.
Nehemia: They would drag him out.
Jono: Man.
Nehemia: Now I donโt know if that really happened, that might be a little bit of what we call Eastern hyperbole, Middle-Eastern hyperbole, exaggeration, but it may have been roughly something like that.
Keith: So, okay, so I know, Jono, that Iโm really, really stretching on this, and Nehemia whoโs gone to the New Testament, I simply want to just ask him a question: So, Nehemia, whatโs the application of this for you? So, youโve been in the midst of a dead body, is there some part of the world where youโd say you wouldnโt go because of your state of uncleanness?
Nehemia: Well, so Yehovah says that He places his name forever. Say forever.
Jono: Forever.
Keith: Forever.
Nehemia: On the place of the Temple. Thereโs no Temple today, but that place is still holy. Iโve lived in Jerusalem for 19 years, and Iโve never been on the spot of the Temple; thatโs because Iโm ritually unclean. If I would go to that spot, I would then be fulfilling, in a bad way, that verse that we read, verse 13 – I would be desecrating, making unclean, the Tabernacle of Yehovah, and my soul would be cut off from Israel.
So, Iโve never been to the holyโฆof the spot of the Temple itself. Iโve been to the Temple Mount, but Iโve never been up beyond whatโs called โthe sorag,โ which was the area that delineated what… on the Temple Mount itself there was a sub-area that was the actual sanctified area that only somebody who is ritually clean could go. Iโve never been past that point where only a ritually clean person would be allowed to go. Essentially, that was the original Temple of Zerubbabel, and then what Herod added on was never really considered sanctified and anybody could go into that area. So, Iโve been into that area because, like you said, Iโve been in the presence of a dead body. Iโve touched a dead body, unfortunately, so Iโve never been up there in 19 years. I hope Iโll be able to go soon when the Messiah comes…
Jono: Amen.
Nehemia: โฆand reestablishes the ritual of the red heifer.
Keith: So, then youโre saying thereโs a spot up there where you physically wouldnโt go. Is that when I said to you, โNehemia, I need you to come up with me because Iโm going to go up and proclaim the name from the Temple Mount,โ you said, โhey, good luck.โ
Nehemia: โI wish you success.โ
Keith: Well, ladies and gentlemen, I just want you to know that I actually did go up there, with Muslims, and stood at the Temple Mount and made a proclamation. As Nehemia said, his name thatโs been there, and heโs placed his name there. And I donโt know exactly, the exact dimensions of where I was, but I did do that, and thatโs been something that I was very, what I call, motivated by, especially as I look at the Temple Mount now, and I see whatโs going up there. And if youโve ever been up in that area, it really does break your heart because youโve got this massive area and you got Herod doing what he does, but you know that you can look across and see where the Dome of the Rock is and you know that under there thereโs the spot where thereโs supposedly the Rock, and actually some 20-some years ago, 1980s, I actually saw that Rock. But now thereโs a Mosque and you donโt get a chance to go in because itโs under the control of Islam right now; itโs a heartbreaking experience to be there and to know that this is not what it was intended to be, and yet itโs also a very exhilarating place to be because you know that this will be the spot where He will restore all of that. So, it really is pretty amazing, and thatโs going to be… somehow, Iโm going to put that up, I donโt know when. Anyway.
Nehemia: Can I share something about my experience up on the Temple Mount? I went up there, and I didnโt go into the place that was the sanctified area – I stayed outside – but what I did see there, it was really one of the saddest things Iโve ever seen; one of the most moving experiences in a good way and a bad way.
I saw there a literal fulfillment of a prophecy that appears in the Book of Jeremiah, chapter 26, verse 18, and it says as follows… actually, a prophecy that heโs quoting from Micah, Mikhah HaMorashti, letโs see, โThus says Yehovah of hosts, โZion shall be plowed as a field, and Jerusalem will be heaps of stones, and the Temple mount shall be,โ you could translate this as, โa high place of a forest, a forest hill-top.โโ
I went up there and this is literally true today – thereโs literally, Iโm not making this up, thereโs literally heaps of rubble and stone on the Temple Mount. The Muslims say that this is their holy place, that this is the third holiest place in Islam. But if you actually go up there, a large part of the Temple Mount today is a garbage dump. Thatโs what the Muslims have done to it, theyโve turned it into a garbage dump. Thatโs a fulfillment of this prophecy, it talks about the โheaps of stones,โ I went up there and I saw the heaps of stones. I actually have pictures of them that I took on my iPhone, and I was shocked. I didnโt expect that, to be honest with you, because I know that the Muslims talk day and night about how this is their holy place and theyโll die to defend it. And I go up there and itโs a garbage dump, a significant portion of it is literally a garbage dump, with heaps of stones and rubble and garbage up on the holiestโฆand you know, they say itโs their third holiest place. This is THE holiest place in the Biblical mindsetโฆ
Jono: Amen.
Nehemia: โฆin the Biblical world.
Jono: Amen.
Nehemia: This isnโt number 3, this is number 1. Itโs the place Yehovah put His name forever, and theyโve literally, in the fulfillment of this prophecy, turned it into a garbage dump and turned it into a forest. There are trees growing there, there were kids up there playing soccer, and there was no respect whatsoever for this place which the Creator of the universe has established as the holiest spot on planet earth.
Jono: Amen. So what Iโve got here, it says in my New King James, โThus says Yehovah of hosts: โZion shall be plowed like a field, Jerusalem shall become heaps of ruin, and the mountain of the Temple like the bare hills of the forest.โโ And thatโs what itโs saying it resembles. Shall we kick off with chapter 20?
Keith: Yes.
Nehemia: Letโs do it.
Jono: Letโs do that. โThen the children of Israel, the whole congregation, came to the Wilderness of Zin in the first month, and the people stayed in Kadesh; and Miriam died there and was buried there.โ
Keith: I think itโs really interesting, and this happens a lot in the Torah, and you know how you have different things that youโre focusing on? For me, itโs always the three Tโs: Time, Torah, Tetragrammaton. Godโs name, Godโs clock and Godโs word, His word. And so, depending on which thing Iโm focusing on, Iโll be reading through the Torah, like Iโll do my reading when Iโm thinking about Torah and Iโll see the words Torah, and Iโm reading through and Iโm talking about time, or about His name. But this is just interesting to me that here we have – and I donโt know exactly, I guess weโve dealt with this issue of chronology back and forth – but in verse 20 it says, โin the first month.โ So, theyโre still counting time from when it was that they left Egypt and it was the first month and what year this is. In other words, whenever I see those words โand in the first month,โ there wasnโt any confusion there about what time it was – they look up, they saw, they kept time.
Nehemia: We donโt know what year it was.
Keith: And you know, itโs just kind ofโฆ we donโt know what year it was. We donโt know what year it was, and thatโs the point. In this situation, theyโre saying, โokay, but we know that it was the first month.โ
Jono: Amen.
Keith: So that, to me is just an example where whatever year it was, theyโre still counting based on looking and saying, hereโs when the month is. The fact that thatโs even in the verse, sort of, is like, wow!
Jono: There it is. And so, unfortunately, Miriam, Moses and Aaronโs sister, she died there and was buried there. I actually want to come back to that in a minute, but it goes on to say… now hereโs is the beginning of an incredible story, Keith, oh my goodness. Here is an amazing story: โNow there was no water for the congregation; so they gathered together against Moses and Aaron. And the people contendedโฆโ, listen, they gathered together against Moses and Aaron yet again, after everything weโve been reading, my goodness. โAnd the people contended with Moses and spoke, saying: โIf only we had died when our brethren had died before Yehovah! Why have you brought up the assembly of Yehovah into this wilderness, that we and our animals should die here? And why have you made us come up out of Egypt, to bring us to this evil place? It is not a place of grain or figs or vines or pomegranates; nor is there any water to drink.โ So Moses and Aaron went from the presence of the assembly to the door of the Tabernacle of Meeting, and they fell on their faces. Andโฆโ once again, it says, โโฆand the glory of Yehovah appeared to them. And then Yehovah spoke to Moses, saying, โTake the rod; you and your brother Aaron gather the congregation together. Speak to the rockโฆโโ Speak to the rock, Keith, โโbefore their eyes, and it will yield its water; thus you shall bring water for them out of the rock, and give drink to the congregation and their animals.โ So Moses took the rod from before Yehovah as He commanded him.โ
And this is what happens, โAnd Moses and Aaron gathered the assembly together before the rock; and he said to them, โHear now, you rebels! Must we bring water for you out of this rock?โ Then Moses lifted his hand and struck the rock twice with his rod; and water came out abundantly, before the congregation and their animals, and they all drank.โ Now, first of all, Keith, what do you make of this story?
Keith: Well, I want to say this, I want to start just at this first section. And this is before we get to real importantโฆ well, I think itโs all important, but just if youโve ever been in the desert without water, Iโve had an experience with Nehemia that Iโd like to tell the story…
Nehemia: You wanted my water.
Keith: That really, and it was really, really amazing, we decided that we wanted to not only teach the prayer, we wanted to go to the places where this prayer made sense, itโs a prayer that Yeshua taught, Jesus, you know, โOur Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name, and lead us not into temptation,โ you know, in the English.
So Nehemiaโs bright idea was, โlook, weโve got to go to the actual spot, weโve got to go to the place where he spent 40 days and 40 nights.โ And you know, Iโm thinking, โokay, fine, weโll do that, weโll go to that spot.โ And Nehemia says, โnow, you have to bring plenty of water.โ Iโm like, โright, Iโll take one,โ and heโs got like three, and Iโm talking about liters of water. I mean, heโs got like three liters of water. Well, we were in the desert for what would be the equivalent of about three hours, my water was gone, after about four hours, I started looking at him, and after five, I started figuring out how I was going to steal it from him. And the reason…
Jono: Are you going to strike him with the stick and steal his water?
Keith: No, are you kidding me? When heโs not looking…
Nehemia: Bury me in the sand.
Keith: No, I was going to ask for forgiveness after the fact. My reason is, and I wanted to bring this up was, during that situation, I was thirsty, and alreadyโฆ they say that if youโre in the desert and you start feeling thirst, that means you already passed the fact that thereโs some dehydration thatโs taking place. So Iโm imagining that for me. And I want to say Nehemia was extremely nice, this is where we had our covenant of salt, we drank from the same water; weโve been friends ever since.
Nehemia: Yes.
Keith: But let me just say this, that I experienced that in just half a day. So imagine that this is going on for a full day, or two days, who knows. Well thereโs a lot of things you can go without – you can go without food for a while, but when you start dealing with the issue of water, there really are effects that can start. So these people may not just be grumbling because theyโre impatient Israelites, these are people that are in the desert that donโt have water. I mean and look, Iโm serious, I mean it couldโve gotten ugly out there in the desert with myself and Nehemia, you know, the project wouldโve ended right then, but he was willing to share. Well, in this situation there was no water to share. So I just want to contextually bring that up before we get into this, that this is not just a matter of convenience โ โhey, we want meat to eat.โ No, this is a matter of life and death. These people are thirsty.
Jono: Yeah, they get a little bit desperate, right?
Keith: Yeah.
Jono: I mean, we just…
Keith: Yeah, I just want…
Jono: I mean you have just come out of drought, about ten years of drought.
Keith: Exactly.
Jono: But I can tell you there were a few times when we, when our house, ran out of water because weโre on tank water, and you start to sort of think about that. I mean, it wasnโt that much of a dilemma, there were certain things we could do. But when the ground is that parched and you look out at the poor sheep in the… I was going to say in the desert, itโs just in the field.
Keith: Yeah.
Jono: But itโs dry and itโs got dust forms and all sorts of things.
Keith: So then after you have this matter of being thirsty, you know, thereโs this issue, and I find this a really interesting twist here. So Yehovah says to Moses and Aaron, โnow hereโs what youโre going to do.โ Thereโs not even a dialogue, itโs not them begging – you know, they fell face down, He heard their prayer, He says, โokay, hereโs what I want you to do.โ And He doesnโt say, โthose darn Israelites, theyโre complaining about waterโฆโ No, He just says, โokay, fine, youโve asked, hereโs what I want you to do. Take the staff,โ now this is a little, small thing. โTake the staff.โ What He couldโve said to Moses and Aaron is, โhey Moses and Aaron, just go out and speak to the rock.โ But what He does is He says, โTake the staff, donโt use the staff, simply speak to the rock.โ
Now, be Moses, Moses is thinking, โokay, I need to do my thing, Iโm about to raise my staff, and Iโm going to do my thing, and theyโre going to know that Yehovah is holy.โ But this little twist changes the game for Moses because He tells him, โTake the staff but speak to the rock.โ You know, sometimes – and let me be a Methodist – sometimes you know, you kind of get these, โthis is how Yehovah has dealt with me in the past, this is how he is dealing with me in the future.โ No, in that situation it was very specific: Take the staff but speak to the rock. So what does Moses do? He takes the staff and then he puts on a show. In other words…
Jono: He does.
Keith: Yeah. I mean, just from reading it… Moses is like, โokay, doggonit, Iโve had enough too,โ and instead of speaking to the rock – and this goes back to the whole thing about Leviticus and the different parts and all the different instructions, because itโs not like Moses is exempt from the specific statutes and regulations that are required, and that to me… this is not favoritism, that to me is a huge thing that takes place. Itโs a small thing in terms of, โTake the staff but speak,โ but itโs a big thing because he speaks, he has dialogue with the Creator of the universe and he tells him specificallyโฆ imagine Jono, or Nehemia, that you meet in the middle of the night, โUh, Nehemia? This is what I want you to do.โ And He gives it to you clear, and the next day you donโt do it. Thatโs what weโre talking about here, this is not confusion, this was very clear. And how do we know that? Because he says this, โBut Yehovah said to Moses and Aaron, โBecause you did not trust in Me enough to honor Me as holy in the sight of the Israelitesโฆโ
Jono: Thatโs interesting.
Keith: โโฆyou will not bring this community,โ That to me, you guys, Iโm telling you.
Jono: Now, Iโve got something.
Keith: Itโs huge.
Jono: Iโve got something different in mine, Keith. It says…
Keith: Oh.
Jono: Because it goes on to say, โThen Yehovah spoke,โ in verse 12, โspoke to Moses and Aaron, โbecause you did not believe Me, to hallow Me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore…โโ
Keith: Oh, weโre going to have to ask Nehemia. Weโre going to have to ask him to read it.
Jono: Whatโs your take on this story, my friend?
Nehemia: โYehovah said to Moses and Aaron, โBecause you didnโt believe me, to sanctify Me before the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore, you shall not bring this congregation to the land which I give to them.โโ I think one of the things about this story isโฆ Iโm confused by this story, and so I can understand how Moses was confused, too. And I think the reason heโs confused, and why Iโm confused, is there are two places, two different stories, that are almost identical, and thereโs one subtle difference between them. Even the names are almost identical.
So weโve gotโฆ the first story appears in Exodus 17, beginning of the chapter there, and that takes place at a place called Rephidim, and Rephidim then gets renamed when the people test God and complain, itโs then called Massah u-Merivah, which means test and strife. In the story of Rephidim, or Massah u-Merivah, there God commanded Moses to hit the rock. Thatโs distinct from whatโs happening here – here God tells Moses to talk to the rock, and this isโฆafter that itโs called Mei Merivah. So, we had Massah u-Merivah, and Mei Merivah, and those sound very, very similar. Then Massah u-Merivah, to complicate matters, is sometimes just called โMassah,โ without the โMerivahโ part.
Some verses mention both of these incidents. So, in the first incident heโs told to hit the rock and in the second incident heโs told to talk to the rock. He hits it because heโs like, โI did this before, I know how this works.โ And then that becomes the test that he has failed and that Yehovah then says, โbecause you didnโt sanctify Me before Israel, therefore, youโre not going to go into the land.โ Could we maybe really quickly read Deuteronomy, chapter 33, verse 8? Can you read that, Keith? Or Jono?
Keith: Go ahead, Jono.
Nehemia: Yeah, because that mentions both โMassahโ and โMerivahโ.
Jono: โAnd of Levi he said: โLet Your Thummim and Your Urim be with Your holy one, Whom You tested at Massah, and with whom You contended at the waters of Meribah.โ
Nehemia: So, the reason this is confusing is that the full name of โMassahโ is Massah u-Merivah, โuโ means โand,โ Massah and Merivah. Then we also have the place which is โMei Merivah,โ the waters of Merivah. And then this verse, Deuteronomy 33:8, refers to Massah and the waters of Merivah, and those are two different places, so itโs extremely confusing.
Theyโre also both mentioned in Psalm 95, verse 8. There it also rehashes; it mentions both of these incidents. If you didnโt know better, youโd say, โwell, wait a minute, this is the same story just being told a little bit differently.โ I think thatโs exactly what confused Moses. Heโs like, โIโve been to this rodeo before, I know God last time told me to hit the rock. Iโm just going to hit it. Iโm not going to talk to the rock.โ
Keith: No, I disagree. Iโve never had a disagreement on Torah Pearls, but this is my first one. Iโm going to have a complete and utter disagreement with my friend, Nehemia Gordon.
Nehemia: Come on.
Keith: Because I donโt think that Moses was confused at all. I think that Moses knows the language, I think that Moses is the one that penned it, I think that Moses knows that in Exodus 17:7 he was dealing with the place Massah, he knew that that was from the word, what is the word Nehemia? Nassah? He knew that was a test. And when that test came, he passed that test.
And I donโt think he was confused at all, Exodus 17:7, I donโt think he was confused at all about the two different places. And I think thatโs why, more than anything, Yehovah held him accountable. I donโt think this was in a matter of ignorance or confusion.
Nehemia: Well, I donโt think it was ignorance or confusion.
Keith: Well, let me finish, Iโm in the middle of an argument with you. Are you kidding me? So I think that Moses absolutely knew that in Exodus 17 it was Massah from the word Nissah, test, thatโs why when we go to Abraham, it says he tested him, Yeshua himself when he was tested, I think that Moses knew and he passed that test with flying colors. And this is why I brought the example of being met, and my heartโs beating on this, and you meet in the middle of the night and you get that word from Yehovah, and itโs clear, and He tells you clearly. And you and I donโt have to – like, Nehemia and I often do this, ladies and gentlemen, weโll be talking about something really important, and Iโve always appreciated this about Nehemia, heโll say, โwe need to pray about that, okay?” And so in the period of time of discernment, you pray about it.
But letโs go back to what we taught the people here. Moses was not like others. He didnโt need to pray about it, he had dialogue with Yehovah, it was as clear as me talking to Jono, and Jono talking to us and the people around the world listening. He had the instruction as clear as the priests get the instruction when it was clear from Yehovah, and I donโt think this was a matter of confusion. I think this was a matter of disobedience.
When he went to the rock, Yehovah told him, โMoses, speak to the rock.โ He knew it was a different rock, it was different, it was a different place, and he didnโt speak to the rock, he showboated in front of the people, and he stood up and said, โhow long will you people ask for us to do this?โ And this is whatโs so amazing about the Bible, it tells us what he said, they, like, donโt have to guess. He got up and he hit it not one time, because if he was confused he shouldโve hit it one time, he hit it twice; once for heaven and earth to let Yehovah know, โlook, Iโll take it from here, Iโm going to showboat in front of these people,โ and Yehovah said, โhey, Moses, come over here for a second, if Iโm going to kill people with a plague… if Iโm going to keep priests, if the sons of Aaron are going to die for not treating me holy, youโre going to be held accountable.โ And I really think this was an example where, when we read this story, weโre supposed to say Moses is not exempt. And if anything, it shows the justice of Yehovah and His righteousness and He will be treated holy. And this is my big argument – I donโt think Moses was confused, and thatโs why he was held accountable.
Jono: Because there…
Nehemia: I donโt think he…
Jono: Because there is a higher level of accountability, right?
Keith: Yeah. Right.
Jono: There is a much higher level of accountability for Aaron and for Moses, and itโs interesting…
Keith: Moses spoke to him face to face.
Jono: Because I mean should he have said… Nehemia, I mean, seriously, should he have said, โHear now house of Israel, Yehovah will bring water out of the rock?โ But instead, we have, โMust we?โ
Keith: โMust we?โ
Jono: โMust we bring water for you out of this rock?โ And itโs interesting that it does make the point that it doesnโt just say that Moses hit the rock…
Nehemia: So why doesnโt he talk to the rock? I guess what Iโm trying to do is psychoanalyze Moses and understand what his reason was, because youโre saying he knew that he was supposed to talk to it, and he hit it. So, what was the reason that he did that? And I still maintain that he had the previous experience where hitting it worked.
Jono: Sure.
Nehemia: And letโs be honest, heโs not a man of words. So, heโs holding that staff, heโs performed the miracles with the staff, he split the sea, he turned the sea into the bloodโฆ
Keith: Thatโs exactly why heโs held accountable.
Nehemia: โฆand now heโs thinking, โWhat, what, what? Am I going to have to talk to it? Heck, no.โ Boom, boom, and the water comes out. And he thinks, โThank God, I didnโt have to speak.โ And Yehovah…
Jono: But he does speak, he says, โHear now, you rebels! Must we bring water out of this rock for you?โ
Keith: Heโs speaking as clear as day here. And Iโm just saying this, and listen, this is a matter, like you say, you can try to analyze it, my point is, why did He hold him accountable? He says…
Nehemia: Yehovah says…
Keith: Hear these words, it says this.
Nehemia: Yes.
Keith: He says this, โBut Yehovah said unto Moses, โBecause you did not trust in Me enough to honor Me as holy.โโ This wasnโt a matter of because… He doesnโt say, โbecause you waved your hand,โ itโs because Yehovah is holy.
Jono: Okay.
Keith: He will be treated as holy. And if itโs a matter of trust, if He says to him, this is what you do, and he doesnโt do it? Look, the story wouldโve been over at the Red Sea, or when he was meeting with Pharaoh. Moses knew exactly what Yehovah instructed him.
Nehemia: No, with Pharaoh, Aaron was the one speaking on his behalf.
Keith: But he did, but Iโm saying. But what Iโm saying is…
Nehemia: And here he speaks, heโs actually… this is what you might call an excited utterance; heโs upset, heโs yelling at the…
Jono: Heโs ticked off.
Nehemia: Heโs ticked off.
Jono: Yeah.
Nehemia: And one of the things that you find with people who stutter is that actually, when theyโre excited, when theyโre saying something in a moment of anger or rage or excitement, they actually donโt stutter, and no one knows why. But then when it comes time, โokay, well, God told me I need to speak to this,โ now, thereโs dead-silence across, you know, thereโs three million people, theyโre in dead-silence. Everyoneโs looking to him, and now itโs time to speak and thereโs no excitement; thereโs trepidation. And heโs like, โheck, thereโs no way, Iโm just going to take the staff and Iโm going to hit it.โ Now, thatโs my psychoanalyzing him; I could be wrong.
Jono: So, can I ask, Nehemia, can I ask you thenโฆ?
Nehemia: Based on what we know about Moses it makes a lot of sense. I understand Mosesโs heart. When youโre standing in front of a group of people, and the groups of people Iโm standing in front of are usually several hundreds, not three million, and when thereโs that dead-silence when you walk out there, that can be intimidating.
Jono: Sure.
Nehemia: And if youโre a man who stutters, I canโt even imagine how intimidating that is.
Jono: So, verse 12, where it says, โBecause,โ now, Keith has got โBecause you did not trust me,โ and Iโve got, โBecause you did not believe Me,โ and thatโs the way you translate it.
Nehemia: Well, literally…
Jono: Now, why did Moses not believe Yehovah here?
Nehemia: Okay. So in Hebrew, to believe and to trust is essentially pretty much the same thing, because the word โemunahโ in Hebrew, which you could translate literally as belief, isnโt just something thatโฆ in the Western world we come from the Greek culture, or you guys come from the Greek culture, and the Greek culture is a culture of thought. They invented philosophy, which is the love of knowledge, of thoughts, of ideas. Hebrew is an action-oriented language. Thatโs the real big difference between Hebrew and Greek thought; theyโre thought-oriented and weโre action-oriented. So, belief isnโt just about thoughts, in Hebrew belief is about action. He may have said, โoh, yeah, I believe God,โ but his actions showed differently. His actions showed a lack of belief.
Keith: And this is what I would say, and Iโm going to stay with the Scripture here, but this is what I would say regarding this whole thing, and why this was so important, and this is what I was waiting to say – I believe that one of the reasons that Yehovah told him to take the staff but yet He told him to speak to the rock is that even Moses had become a little bit depended on his staff, or maybe even Moses started saying, โyes, Iโve got the magic stick, hereโs what it does.โ And Yehovahโs, โbring your staff but donโt use it.โ
Jono: Sure.
Keith: โSpeak to the rock.โ
Jono: Perhaps I mean, both of them…
Keith: Iโm just saying, and my point is this happens in history – you know what, hereโs the snake, the bronze snake?
Jono: Yeah, weโll go into that.
Keith: Look to the snakeโฆ
Nehemia: Look at the head.
Keith: And the next thing you know, what do we find out some years later? No, no, my point isโฆ
Jono: Yeah.
Keith: โฆthat theyโre bringingโฆ that thing that was used to show Godโs glory ends up being its glory itself. And this happens in Christianity and everywhere else.
Jono: Yeah.
Keith: The only thing Iโm saying is, I think itโs phenomenal that He said, โbring the staff but donโt use it,โ and I think the fact that Moses did use the staff was an example of not trusting Yehovah, and the fact that he didnโt do what He told him to do is why thereโs accountability and I donโt think he was confused at all, I think he was showboating, but thatโs my opinion.
Jono: Thatโs compelling.
Keith: Letโs move on.
Jono: Moving on, Edom… now, correct me if Iโm wrong, but is not Edom descendants of Esau, is that right?
Nehemia: Thatโs correct. Edom is the son of Esau, the brother of Jacob.
Jono: Okay. And they wouldnโt let the Israelites pass through, they pleaded with him, โlet us, weโll stay on the Kingโs Highway; we wonโt do anyโฆ and if we drink any water, weโll pay for it.โ And he insisted, โnoโ. And the interesting thing is that they donโt say, โWell, Iโll tell you what – how about this, weโll just wipe you out instead.โ
Nehemia: Okay. They were commanded not to do that. That God had given the land of Edom to the descendants of Esau and later on in Deuteronomy, weโll hear thereโs a specific commandment not to conquer Edom, Moab, and Ammon – the Ammonites, the Moabites, and the Edomites. Those are our cousins through Esau and through Lot. And theyโve got their land, weโre supposed to leave them alone. Weโve got our land; weโre supposed to liberate it.
Jono: Amen.
Keith: There it is.
Jono: There it is. And so, Israel, they turned away from Edom, is what happened. But in verse 22, โThe children of Israel, the whole congregation, journeyed from Kadesh and came to Mount Hor. And Yehovah spoke to Moses and Aaron at Mount Hor by the border of the land of Edom, saying: โAaron shall be gathered to his people,โโ and thereโs some news you donโt want to hear, โAaron shall be gathered to his people, for he shall not enter the land which I have given to the children of Israel, because you rebelled against My word,โ Keith, is what it says, โbecause you rebelled against My word at the waters of Meribah.โ Okay.
Keith: And I think, one thing I was going to say about this – can you imagine us right now, us, the three of us, we donโt know when our day will come. We donโt know when weโre going to die, we donโt know, Yehovah has not said, at least that I know of, โKeith is about to be gathered to his people,โ you know. But be Aaron. Can you imagine that? I meanโฆ
Jono: I know.
Keith: โฆjust hearing that? Like, I mean, like, okay, youโre not…
Nehemia: Thatโs got to suck.
Jono: Yeah. I know. Itโs like, โokay, now, listen, you know, youโre going to go up on a hill and youโre not going to come down.โ
Keith: Yeah. Right. Thatโs it.
Jono: Okay. So thatโs what happens.
Nehemia: One thing to point out here, and this is me jumping ahead into a different Torah portion in Deuteronomy, which is that weโve got this story, and itโs like one thing after another. Theyโre in Kadesh, in the Wilderness of Zin, and the next thing we know theyโre at Mount Hor and Aaron is dying. Itโs very misleading because, in Deuteronomy we find out that they spent years at Kadesh. And between the time they left Kadesh to when they essentially reached the end of this Torah portion was 38 years. From when they arrived at Kadesh until the end of… really, chapters 20 through 21 of Numbers is a span of 38 years, and we find that out from the Book of Deuteronomy. But from here itโs like one event after another, and itโs a little bit misleading. So thatโs something important to bear in mind.
Jono: Let me just jump back to the beginning of this chapter. Is there a tomb of Miriam?
Nehemia: Iโm sure somewhere thereโs a tomb of Miriam, but we donโt know where Miriamโs real tomb is, letโs put it that way. I donโt think Jewish tradition has a tomb of Miriam, but I wouldnโt be surprised if other traditions have a tomb of Miriam. There is a Muslim sight, which is identified as the tomb of Aaron. I donโt think anybody in the Jewish world takes that really seriously as Aaronโs actual tomb. But we pretty much know which mountainโฆ or the mountain that heโs identified as having died on, is called in the Tanach Hor Hahar, or Mount Hor, and is identified as a mountain next to Petra, which is in the kingdom of Jordan in the south.
Jono: Sure.
Nehemia: And thatโs the area that was historically part of Edom. And in fact, Petra was the capital of Edom, the capital of the Edomites.
Jono: So the high priesthood is transferred to Eleazar, his son, and it says, โAaron was gathered to his people. He died there, they stripped him of his garments and put them on Eleazar his son; and Aaron died there on the top of the mountain. Then Moses and Eleazar came down from the mountain. Now when all the congregation saw that Aaron was dead, all the house of Israel mourned for Aaron thirty days.โ
Keith: Thirty days.
Jono: Yeah.
Keith: Thirty days. Yes.
Jono: There it is.
Keith: Okay.
Jono: And now thereโs an attack, right? The Canaanites, โThe king of Arad, the Canaanite, who dwelt in the South, heard that Israel was coming along the road. And he fought with them, he took some of them prisoners.โ How about that? โSo Israel made a vow to Yehovah, and said, โIf You will indeed deliver this people into my hand, then I will utterly destroy their cities.โ And Yehovah listened to the voice of Israel and delivered up the Canaanites, and they utterly destroyed them and their cities. So the name of that place was called Hormah.โ
Nehemia: Hormah is from the word โharam.โ It says here, โva-yiharem,โ and he utterly destroyed; so Hormah is utter destruction.
Jono: Utter destruction.
Keith: Can I read this part?
Jono: I was just about to say, Keith; will you take us through The Bronze Serpent?
Keith: Look, this is the Methodist section, so this is great.
Jono: Yeah.
Keith: โSo they traveled from Mount Hor along the route,โ what are you talking about, โthe route to the Red Sea, to go around Edom. But the people grew impatient on the way; they spoke against God and against Moses, and said, โHave you brought us up out of Egypt to die in the desert? There is no bread, there is no water and we detest this miserable food!โโ Three things: no bread, no water, and that which youโve given us we donโt even like. โAnd the LORD sent venomous snakes among them, and they bit the people and many Israelites died. The people came to Moses and said, โWe sinned when we spoke against Yehovah and against you. Pray that Yehovah will make the snakes go away from us.โ So Moses prayed for the people. The LORD said to Moses, โMake a snake and put it up on a pole; anyone who is bitten can look at it and live.โ So Moses made a bronze snake and put it up on a pole. Then when anyone was bitten by a snake and looked at the bronze snake, he lived.โ Can I get an Amen?
Jono: Well, thatโs what it says. Amen. But I mean, Keith, itโs one of the strangest, and the first thing that comes…
Keith: What are you talking about?
Jono: Well, the first thing that comes to my mind is the Second Commandment, right? But keep going.
Keith: What do you mean itโs strange? Here we have, again… this is just a chapter later when it happened, how long it happened, here itโs a chapter later and he says, โOkay, look, I sent the snakes – okay, Iโll tell you what Iโm going to do. Go and take this bronze snake, put it on a pole, life it up and then whoever looks at the snake is healed.โ
Nehemia: Can I ask what might sound like a stupid question? Why was it a bronze, or actually copper, why was it a bronze or copper snake? Why wasnโt it an iron snake, or a gold snake? I mean, gold is much more venerable than copper.
Jono: Sure.
Keith: Oh, thatโs a great question.
Jono: I donโt have an answer to that.
Nehemia: So, in Hebrew itโs a play on words, because the word for snake is โnahash,โ and the word for copper, or bronze, is nehoshet, and together that becomes nahash-nehoshet, a copper snake. So, itโs a play on words.
Jono: Right. So, what Keith has, Keithโs got โvenomous snakes.โ What I have in the New King James is โfiery serpents,โ itโs fiery and copper. Is that in the Hebrew? Are they…
Nehemia: No. So โsarafโ is a type of snake, and thatโs what theyโre translating in yours as โfiery serpents.โ Presumably, they say that was a snake that, when it bit you, you felt a burning. If youโve ever been stung by a bee or a wasp you know what thatโs about.
Jono: Sure. Yeah. Sure.
Nehemia: Iโve never been bitten by a snake, but I have been stung by a wasp, and it burns like, oh my gosh. So thatโs โsaraf,โ that word in verse 8. But then in verse 9 it says, โAnd Moses made nahash-nehoshet,โ a copper snake. So, snake is the broader term, โsarafโ is a specific type of snake. So, itโs a play on words, and later onโฆIโm going to let Keith bring this. Later on, itโs called โNehushtan,โ which means… I donโt know, you could translate that as โcoppery snake,โ or you know, basically itโs a combination of the word โcopperโ and โsnake,โ Nehushtan, but itโs from the word nehoshet, which means copper.
Jono: So, Keith, it says this in Exodus 20, verse 4, โYou shall not make for yourself a carved imageโany likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water underneath it; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them.โ Now I understand, of course, theyโre not bowing down – at least not yet – to the snake.
Keith: Yeah, right.
Nehemia: I think this actually shows that the purpose there of that commandment, itโs dealing with things that are then to be worshipped. Meaning, โdonโt make yourself an idol to worship,โ is what I think itโs saying in the Second Commandment.
Jono: Amen.
Keith: Amen.
Nehemia: So, if you think about it, likeโฆso little children, 3000 years agoโฆis God telling the Israelites, โdonโt make for them little toy horses and little toyโฆโ, is that really what it means? They actually did have toys back then, if anybodyโs laughing and saying they didnโt; they did; they had them made out of pottery, little earthenware horses, we find in excavations, that were used as toys. I donโt think that that was a prohibition to not let your children have toys. I think the point there is, donโt make things that… donโt give an idol to worship. Now, the problem here, Iโll let Keith talk about this, is what happens afterward.
Keith: No, thatโs okay. No, no I just want to say this, though – I think that one of the things I want to look at again, and I think what Nehemia just brought up is a great example. No, the point that heโs saying here is that thereโs this bronze snake thatโs been made for this purpose, how he actually wants to have that bronze snake, in terms of bringing healing. Heโs not saying, โmake this bronze snake and bow down to it.โ In other words, I donโt think this has anything personally to do with that command of creating an image and then bowing down to it. I think it has to do with the instruction of Yehovah, โand this is how I want you to do it, and this is how the healingโs going to take place.โ So imagine someone saying, โokay, I was bitten but Iโm not going to look at the snake.โ Guess what? You die.
Jono: Yeah.
Keith: Itโs that clear.
Jono: Alright.
Keith: Okay.
Jono: So I have a question, Nehemia, I have a question thatโs…
Nehemia: Wait, wait, are we not going to bring 2 Kings 18:4?
Keith: Sure we are. Of course, we are.
Jono: Alright.
Nehemia: I mean, weโre talking about this Nechushtan.
Keith: Wait, no, no. No, you continue.
Jono: 2nd Kings, chapter 18, verse 4.
Keith: Yeah.
Jono: Okay. โHe removed the high places and broke the sacred pillars, cut down the wooden images and broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made; for until those days the children of Israel burned incense to it, and called it,โ and now Iโve got, โNechushtan.โ
Nehemia: Nechushtan.
Keith: Itโs Nechushtan.
Nehemia: This is such an amazing story to me because this is the time of King Hezekiah and heโs finally getting rid of the high places and all the illegitimate worship thatโs going on. And thereโs this relic there – itโs a relic that Moses himself made by the direct command of Yehovah. Itโs a relic that, if you look on it, can actually bring healing, but the problem is that the people are worshipping it. Yehovah says, โlook upon that copper serpent and youโll be healed from snakebites.โ And what do they do? They start to forget whatโs going on; they say, โoh, the copper serpent up on that stick is giving the healing? Iโm going to worship it,โ and they burn incense to it. Hezekiah realizes it needs to be destroyed. It needs to be ground into dust, which is what it says, โkitat,โ he ground up into mortar. He completely turned it into dust because, even though Moses made it by the direct commandment of Yehovah, it had become a stumbling block for the people and it needed to be destroyed.
Keith: Amen. Amen. And thatโs, again, connected to the idea you brought up, Jono, regarding the command of… the very thing you said, well, isnโt this something that, when he created and itโs a purpose of what it was created for, it fulfills a purpose.
Jono: Amen.
Keith: What they did it is they took that further and said, โoh, this is a great thing. Letโs take a good thing a make it a great thing and letโs franchise this thing. Hey, letโs make this the thing that we, you knowโฆโ
Jono: Sure.
Keith: I mean, so.
Jono: Thereโs a lot of that. And just before we move on then, Nehemia, how many years are we talking between the event in Numbers and King Hezekiah? Just some round figures.
Nehemia: So, Iโd say roughly something like 750 years – 800 years.
Jono: Sure. Okay. Thatโs how long they had it, and it makes you wonder how long they wereโฆ
Nehemia: Well they, you know…
Jono: It had reached the sort…
Keith: Hundreds of years, people they recreated the bronze snake.
Nehemia: Yeah. It was an ancient thing, and it was directly tied to Moses, legitimately so. And they said, โokay, weโve got healing in this, weโre going to burn incense and worship it.โ
Jono: There it is. Picking up the pace a little bit, guys, in Numbers, chapter 21, verse 14, โTherefore it is said, the Book of the Wars of Yehovah.โ Where is that book?
Nehemia: Thatโs a good question.
Keith: Iโll tell you what.
Nehemia: No one knows.
Jono: Keith?
Keith: No one knows but one thing thatโs amazing, itโs like the Book of Chronicles, the Kings of Israel and we see these witnesses in Scripture that there are these other sources that were definitely in existence at the time that these things were written, so I know that we could go off the trail here and talk about the many things that have been found, and thatโs why weโve got to go to the Book of Jubilees, or the Book of Enoch, or the book of whatever thatโs been found and whatever. But I think one of the things that we can acknowledge is that these were sources that existed but they didnโt make it into the…
Jono: They werenโt preserved, at least, or they didnโt make it into the…
Nehemia: Well, maybe they actually were, and let me point something out.
Keith: Yeah.
Nehemia: The word โbook,โ in ancient Hebrew, the word โseferโ, โbookโ, refers to any written document. In fact, when it talks about a divorce and it says the man will give the woman a certificate of separation, it actually is โsefer kritut,โ which you could translate as โa book of separation.โ So โseferโ is any written thing. There are ancient inscriptions which are ten lines long, and inscription refers to, you know, itโs written on stone in ancient Hebrew, and it refers to itself as a โsefer,โ as a book. So โseferโ could be a very short document. Itโs very possible that, โthe Book of the Wars of Yehovah,โ is simply verses 14 through 15, or this small passage here. That might be the extent – possibly even through verse 20 – that might be the entire extent of โthe Book of the Wars of Yehovah,โ that might be it. Itโs not a very big book in that case. But we donโt know, maybe there was a bigger book and it just doesnโt exist. Who knows?
Jono: Sure.
Keith: Alright.
Jono: Okay. So it goes on now, there is the defeat of the King Sihon, there is the defeat of King Og. And is there anything, just picking up the pace, Keith, is there anything you want to highlight in the end of chapter 22 here? Chapter 21, rather.
Keith: No, no, Iโm fine.
Nehemia: Woah.
Jono: Nehemia?
Nehemia: Verse 29, can we read this?
Keith: Absolutely.
Nehemia: This is a song that they sang at some point. Itโs actually a proverb, in verse 27 itโs described, it says, โTherefore those who speak the proverbs will say,โ and then they have this proverb. Itโs not clear who those proverb speakers are; maybe theyโre not even Israelites, because in verse 29, it says, โWoe onto you, Moab! The people of Chemosh are destroyed.โ Chemosh is the God of Moab, the God of the Moabites, which leads me to think that this is not a Hebrew – or excuse me, I should say, not an Israelite, at least I hope itโs not an Israelite, poem or proverb, but that this may have actually been a Moabite or an Edomite, or something from the area, a proverb from that region.
That actually brings up a really interesting thing, which is that the archeologists have found ancient writing, ancient inscriptions, in several languages, and those include Moabite, Ammonite, and Edomite. Now, remember the Moabites, the Ammonites, and the Edomites are the cousins of Israel. And guess what? Their language is almost identical to Hebrew; so much so that, if you put vowel markers in it, I would say that just about any literate person in Israel would be able to read those ancient Hebrew inscriptions. Now, there are some words that are different and some grammatical forms that are different, but basically… thatโs the type of difference you can have within any given language. Even between American English and Australian, youโve got some differences. So, these differences are a little bit bigger, but basically, Moabite, Ammonite, and Edomite are dialects of Hebrew. Theyโre almost identical to the language of the Bible. So, this proverb here is probably not a Hebrew proverb, itโs probably an Edomite, or a Moabite, or an Ammonite proverb. Thatโs why itโs mentioning Chemosh in verse 29.
Jono: There we go. Thank you for that. Alright, Iโm going to jump right to the end. Are you ready? Because weโre pretty much run out of time.
Keith: Okay.
Jono: This is the first… and you know what, Iโm really excited, this is the first verse, chapter 22, it says, โThen the children of Israel moved and camped in the plains of Moab on the side of the Jordan across from Jericho.โ Now, the reason why Iโm excited, oh, my goodness, the next Torah portion isโฆ
Keith: Yes
Jono: โฆBalak, Numbers 22, verse 2, to 25:9. This has got to be one of my favorite Torah portions, I think.
Keith: Okay.
Jono: And Iโm really looking forward to that one, soโฆ
Nehemia: Iโm just so excited they finally made it to the border of the land. Theyโre in the plains of Moab, just across from Jericho, and that excites me because I can actually go outside, walk for two or three minutes to the top of the hill from where I live and see the plains of Moab. So that excites me.
Jono: Wow.
Nehemia: This is something I can actually see. Halleluyah. They reached theโฆI mean, imagine, that means they look back and they can see Jerusalem, the heart of the land of Canaan, the heart of Israel. Thatโs got to be exciting.
Keith: Amen.
Nehemia: Theyโve been wandering for 40 years.
Jono: 40 years.
Nehemia: And theyโre finally there. Whoo!
Keith: Amen.
Jono: Weโre going to get there in the next Torah portion. Thank you, Keith Johnson and Nehemia Gordon. Youโve been listening to Torah Pearls. Until next time, dear listeners, be blessed and be set apart by the truth of our Fatherโs word. Shalom.
You have been listening to The Original Torah Pearls with Nehemia Gordon, Keith Johnson and Jono Vandor. Thank you for supporting Nehemia Gordonโs Makor Hebrew Foundation. Learn more at NehemiasWall.com.
We hope the above transcript has proven to be a helpful resource in your study. While much effort has been taken to provide you with this transcript, it should be noted that the text has not been reviewed by the speakers and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. If you would like to support our efforts to transcribe the teachings on NehemiasWall.com, please visit our support page. All donations are tax-deductible (501c3) and help us empower people around the world with the Hebrew sources of their faith!
Makor Hebrew Foundation is a 501c3 tax-deductible not for profit organization.
Subscribe to "Nehemia Gordon" on your favorite podcast app!
Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | โจAmazon Musicโจย | TuneIn
Pocket Casts | Podcast Addict | CastBox | iHeartRadio | Podchaserโจ | Pandora



Why would Moses after total obedience decide to randomly become disobedience to YHVH? He knew what Got was capable of based on recent past events.. For this was not his first rodeo. I my opinion it was a matter of frustration. He has millions of people clambering for water. The children crying to moms and moms stressing out dads to act. Dads going to Moses and pressuring him to go the God. It must have been a time of great ANXIETY, hence โฆ.the beginning of, not trusting YHVH. And despite the fact God told Moses what to do and how to d it. Mose being human is not immediately relieved of his feeling of being overwhelmed. The masses are still without water. For the moment are murmuring and complaining. This a is human response to a dire situation, exacerbated by crying and complaining of the multitudes. I donโt believe ( trying to place myself in that situation..given the information available) Moses was not show boating. Not at all. But I do believe he let the voices of the people ring louder in his ears than the words of YeHoVah. He took his eyes off God (Matthew 14) Lost his focus and the clear words of God. And failed, as we all have.
Just my perspective. Thanks for allowing me to share. One day we will know exactly what was on Moses mind.
Love your teachings!!! Yasher Koach.
Excellent Thank You
Moses was angry. We have to bring water from the rock. We will use the last method.
Anger blinds our eyes and we focus on self, causing us to disobey Yehovahโs command.
Consider, if you will, another reason Moses died without entering the Promised Land. His last recorded official act was confirming the covenant of Deuteronomy for Israel (Deu 29:9, 14, [8, 13, TNK]) . He had been Israelโs connection to Yehovah, especially after the golden calf (Num 11:11-12, Ex 34:29-35, II Cor 3:7, NASB, NIV, CSB, ESV). That covenant established the Levitical priesthood as the connection to Yehovah (Deu 18:1-5, 17:8-10, Num 27:21). This arrangement was a new thing. It was not made with the patriarchs, the fathers (Deu 5:3). If Moses had continued alive after Eleazar became Yehovahโs official connection for Israel there might have been significant second guessing among the people. They would have still looked to Moses as the best source of Yehovahโs will. Eleazarโs as well a Joshuaโs ability to do their job could have been significantly undermined. The agreement of Deuteronomy expected them to do their job without interference.
Hi… I always enjoy your podcasts! This past week I heard about taking ASHES of wood, mixing it with WATER, letting it sit, then draining the liquid. That’s how LYE is made… which was used for making soap… (for the ‘preppers’)
That reminded me of Jer 2.22, “though I wash you with NITRE…” Nitre happens to be a mineral POTASH – ie POT ASH… which is how they made soap. But the lye in its very undiluted strength can actually dissolve an entire carcass over the course of a week or so… depending on size.
Num 18.6 says CEDAR WOOD was also burned with the heifer. Vs 9: they gather the ASHES … for the WATER of separation.
Just maybe there is a connection. Shalom!
Did not Moshe commit “chillul hashem ืืืืื ืืฉื: in front of the people by this act?
I don’t think Moshe was confused or showing off. I think he was just really angry with the congregation of Israel and acted in anger instead of trust in Yehovah. That’s what got him in trouble.
Th law is NOT done away with, all you “christians” out there. The apostle Paul partook in a NAZARITE VOW in the new testament AFTER Yahushuas death and ressurection! And tje deciples told him to do this vow in order to prove once and for all to all to everyone, that Paul did indeed keep and teach the law to all who would listen. Paul even taught the law to gentiles. But more importantly, the book of Numbers details what a Nazarite vow consists of, and it REQUIRES blood animal sacrafice! Which means the true believers of Messiah were still sacrificing animals when required, even after Yahushuas death and ressurection! This is something self proclaiming lawless Christian’s van never understand, due to their ignorance and disobedience.
Matthew, sorry, but u r wrong. jc never existed.
I like the point made about turning the brazen serpent into god. The Almighty can use anything even today to perform a miracle in our life. Let’s be careful not to transform that means into an object of worship. We could see that even today.
It’s is important to check anger too if not it can lead us not to honor our Father. Shalom
Thank You
I am seeking the truth……..thank you
My question is regarding Aharon. He didn’t strike the rock showing lack of belief in YHVH nor deny YHVH’s holiness before the children of Israel. So why was he stripped of his priesthood and not allowed entrance to the Promised Land? Am I missing something?
I mean I’m sure it wouldn’t have nothing to do with the orchestrating the whole deal with the golden calf while Moses was up getting the law.
Moses and Aharon both represented the Old Covenant. God told them to speak to the rock not to strike it. They disobeyed Him and struck the rock. The rock is a type of the Messiah. In the first instance when they needed water, God told Moses to strike the rock because Messiah would be stricken for the sins of the people. He would only be struck once, then after that all we need to do is speak to the rock, call upon the name of the Lord and we will be saved. This scenario was marred by Moses and Aharon’s disobedience. They couldn’t enter the promised land because of it and the fact they represented the old covenant. Joshua was permitted because He represents the new covenant in Messiah Jesus/Joshua, the rock that was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities – Isaiah 53:5
These foreshadows and typologies are all over the Torah and the prophets.
I have heard this teaching before, it totally makes sense
Joh 7:37 And on the last day, the great day of the festival, ืืืืฉืข stood and cried out, saying, โIf anyone thirsts, let him come to Me, and let him who believes in Me drink.
Joh 7:38 โAs the Scripture said, out of His innermost shall flow rivers of living water
In Isaiah 32:2, the Messiah is compared to “a great rock in a weary land.” They found the rock that was split. It’s four stories high. You can see the video about it on Youtube. The documentary is called “Mountain of Fire.” The water that poured out from the rock is symbolic of the Holy Spirit we receive though Jesus, the Living waters, as you have recognized. Thanks for the scriptures.
Cheri, jc never existed.
Deb, jc never existed.
Was Aaron ceremonially clean, prior to the first red heffer was burned?
Enjoyed this teaching a lot blessings to you guys
1 Corinthians 10:4 says: “And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.” So both incidents seem to be prophetic with the Rock representing Yeshua.
In both incidents Moses symbolizes the Israeli civil authorities. His rod symbolizes that authority. In the first instance Moses strikes the Rock and it splits, as revealed in Psalm 78:15: ” He clave the rocks in the wilderness, and gave them drink as out of the great depths.” So the prophecy is that the mission of the Messiah will be divided into two parts and the point of division will come immediately after the Israeli civil authorities strike Yeshua. Note that in the first incident Moses is not criticized for splitting the Rock. Yehovah told Moses to smite the Rock and that is exactly what he did. This means that the Israeli authorities (whatever their other faults) were not responsible for the death of Yeshua. It was preordained by Yehovah in order that the Holy Spirit might be poured out at Pentacost.
The second incident evidently relates to the second coming, but is more difficult to interpret. Was Moses’ striking of the Rock part of the prophecy? In that case it seems to predict that the Israeli authorities will strike Yeshua also at the the second coming and thereby be prevented from entering into the spiritual promised land. Or is Jehovah upset with Moses because he botched the prophecy which was supposed to be that the Israeli authorities will speak to Yeshua and will be allowed to enter in to the spiritual promised land? Perhaps the ambiguity is deliberate in order to leave the choice open open to them.
In any case, it seems to indicate that the second coming will come at a stressful time when the Israeli people are upset with and losing confidence in both their religious and governmental leaders.
I also have the feeling that Yehovah is also using this incident to demonstrate that the Torah alone cannot save anyone because not even Moses, the author of the Torah, was able to keep it perfectly.
There is a misconception that the Torah was given by Yehovah for the purpose of being kept perfectly.
The Torah is for instruction on how to live and treat each other with equity, love and compassion having God as teacher and judge. We all sin when we turn aside from them to go after empty things that can neither profit nor deliver. What happens then to the one who sins?
King Solomon tells us when he said, “When they sin against You, FOR THERE IS NO ONE WHO DOES NOT SINโฆ and repent and make supplication to Youโฆ saying, ‘We have sinned and have committed iniquity, we have acted wickedly ‘ if they return to You with all their heart and with all their soulโฆ Then hear their prayer and their supplication in heaven Your dwelling place, and maintain their cause, and forgive Your people who have sinned against You and all their transgressions which they have transgressed against You. (1 Kings 8)
Ted, jc never existed.
Nehemia the reason from my understanding that he hit the rock is because he was upset that the people were coming at him and wouldn’t let him grieve over his sister.
Ok, is it possible that the snake on a pole was โcopperโ because the snakes were copper heads?
Lol, Brass Sister, lol
please stay away from Christian writings as it is a heathen religion(of the Roman Empire). don’t believe anyone is to go where Yahweh dwells after death as that would assume a judgement of some kind. thank you.
Isreal goes to his promised land after 40 yrs. I can imagine Moses saying I need a vacation after this. And so Yehovah takes him to his promised land. Some think it was sad he wasn’t able to go unto the land. But he did. What better place to be than with Yehovah. Now he lives forever. I wonder when in time or where he went to just chill and have a glass of wine.
As for me, I misunderstood the scriptures of purification since my youth, and I’m also glad that I didn’t go up on the Temple Mount to wander onto the Holiest spot on the planet, which would have really messed things up for myself. Thanks for clearing things up. If I ever get a chance to go back to Jerusalem there’s a lot I want to see and do, with a better understanding next time around.
I have spent most of the entirety of my last four Sabbaths listening to Torah Pearls while I rest. This has been a blessing to me as I am eagerly trying to learn to live by YAHOVA’S wonderful Torah!
Thank you Nehemiah and Keith and that Australian guy ?
We tend to see Moses’ death as a punishment from God for not being obedient. But is it a punishment to be allowed to go into The Kingdom and BE WITH God? Yes, he was ‘punished’ by not getting to go into the Promised Land, but he had spent most of his life serving The Living God… is it wrong to think his spirit was allowed to continue his relationship with Yehovah after his physical burial, a relationship not bound by a physical body?
Thank you Nehemia for the point you brought out about going up on the Temple Mount. As I was reading this Torah portion, I was concerned about the lack of being able to receive the this cleansing today. During your discussion, you made it clear that our being cut off from Israel today due to coming in contact with a dead body and not being sprinkled with the Waters of Purification on the 3rd and seventh days, would only take place if we went up on the Temple Mount to the area of the Temple and defiled it. That cleared up a Hugh question for me. I have never been blessed to go to Israel, but if I ever do get there, you can believe I will not go any further than the Kotel!!
I think the real reason Moses struck the rock instead of speaking to it is obvious, based on what he said first and how he said it: “Hear now, you rebels; must we fetch you water out of this rock?” Moses had a meltdown. He was angry and gave place to his wrath; because of that, he did not follow the instructions of Yehovah exactly. I believe Yehovah had very significant reasons for telling him to speak to the rock instead of striking it, and Moses messed that up by allowing his wrath to speak for him.
Agreed his “character” didn’t show the “character” of YHWH correctly for that moment, from what i understand.
” Strike vs Speak ”
The act of striking the Rock continued the display of authority represented by or in the staff – tangible focal point of power. We forget that the typical sojourner of that day was very superstitious and would attribute magical powers where none existed. However, when Moshe is told to SPEAK to the Rock it reveals a different and more intimate source of this “magical power”. This event appears at a time when Moshe and Aaron’s authority seem to be under continual assault, yes ? So, when Moshe is told to speak to the Rock, it is an opportunity to show Israel that not only is Moshe’s staff loaded with Yehovah’s power ( perceived ) but that Moshe himself has this power in his breath – words. Words are power and words matter. If Moshe would have obeyed and spoke to the Rock, he would have proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that not only did he wield authority in his staff but he also had this authority in himself – his ruach – his spoken WORDS. Again, the superstitious Israelite would have witnessed it this way; ” The power of everything we have witnessed since leaving Egypt is actually coming out of Moshe’s ( breath – words ) MOUTH. I other words, Deuteronomy 30:10-14. Moshe’s true authority was an arm’s length away from his staff – in his heart.
Very interesting insight here.
Moses was a leader of the people, leaders are held to a higher account, so that no matter why Moses errored, he had to be held to account, there was no one to mediate punishment for Moses like Moses did for the Children at the Golden Calf; so the highest punishment was meeted out. So as leaders or teachers; we must be very clear what we instruct our people or what we teach them.
I believe Numbers 33 gives us the chronology for determining if Miriam in the 1st month, died in the 40th year.
.
Nu 33:36-39
36 And they journeyed from Ezion-geber, and camped in the wilderness of Zin, that is, Kadesh. (Miriam?)
37 And they journeyed from Kadesh, and camped at Mount Hor, at the edge of the land of Edom.
38 Then Aaron the priest went up to Mount Hor at the command of the Lord, and died there, in the fortieth year after the sons of Israel had come from the land of Egypt on the first day in the fifth month.
39 And Aaron was one hundred twenty-three years old when he died on Mount Hor.
.
Otherwise you have MANY YEARS camped at Kadesh, where the chapters that follow are in Chronological order on the way to Jericho?
Thanks gents. Listening again, I was helped by your observations about “perfection” of the red heifer. I think I am going to have to discuss this issue with one of our associate pastors (Baptist) who taught us that the “old covenant” failed because no animal sacrificed for sin was perfect. (that’s a crude summary). Apart from the fact that Yehovah surely did not institute a covenant that could never work, I feel this misuses the phrase translated “without defect”. Surely what is required is not perfection down to the last hair, but like Micah challenged the people about; not offering blind or crippled animals. Does the Hebrew translated as “without blemish” clarify this? Bless you guys in what you are doing. Michael @ wildolive
There is a red heifer in Lakewood New York and it is being guarded and not being worked. Rabbis have inspected it and declared it is kosher and meets the requirements.
Actually, Lakewood, New Jersey.
Another interpretation of Mosesโ sin: Num 20:10 says, โโฆ”Now listen, you rebels, can WE draw water for you from this rock.” Here, the โweโ refers to Moses and Aaron, in other words, Moses is saying they are bringing water from the rock.
Then in verse 12 God says, โโฆ”Since you did not have faith in Me to sanctify Me in the eyes of the children of Israelโฆโ In other words, Moses should have given credit to God, that is, Moses should have said in verse 10, โGod will draw waterโฆโ
Re. the matter of cleanness/uncleanness after an encounter with a dead body, I don’t understand why Nehemia says that he or anyone else who has had such an encounter would then be ritually unclean until, well, “forever” until the temple is rebuilt and the waters of purification reconstituted. Num. 19 says that you would only be unclean for 7 days.
On the other hand, if the state of impurity only exists for 7 days, I don’t really see why you would benefit from undergoing a 7-day ritual of purification; your uncleanness will be over in 7 days in any case, right?
The uncleanness is for 7 days IF one is undergoing the purification with the ashes of the red heifer, i.e., sprinkling on the 3rd and 7th days and immersion in a mikveh. Without the ashes, the impurity remains.
The Torah demands to wash one’s entire body rather than simply dunk in a body of standing water. The demand for a Miqweh is Rabbinic and totally non-Scriptural.
Hang on! Number refers to these snakes as seraphim, the same term used in Isaiah and other ancient texts. How is this possible?
Christianity sees the serpent on the pole as type of Jesus. This is an interesting interpretation because Jesus has literally become an idol. As the Messiah he is not recognisable to Jews and Islamists. They see a church-made abomination. Was this a prophetic symbol?
jc is false, never existed.
I was taught bronze/copper represent judgement. Gold-Deity, silver-redemption. As per Temple Instuite. As we studied the Temple in the wilderness, the outside couplings-bronze, copper, represent judgement, the second layer silver was used, redemption, then the inner court, Holy of Holies, gold is used.
I thank you for share your wisdom .
The way you doit, is so delightful.
What if Moses disobeyed on purpose in order to bring YHVH’s wrath on himself rather than on the people for complaining yet again? His history is to always obey YHVH to the letter, so this is completely out of character for him. He also has a history of volunteering himself on behalf of the people. Makes a lot of sense to me. (you may have heard this one before–I just listened to Yoel’s torah round table)
Cross focus and cross worship is endemic in Christianity. Yeshua was crucified on a ‘stake / stauros, not a cross. The bronze/copper serpent was put on a ‘pole’ and as you point out it ‘became’ an idolatrous object in Israel. The ‘barber’ poles in America with the ‘entwined’ red stripes – are they a replica of Nehushtan? Great program !