Hebrew Voices #88 – A Geneticist’s Perspective on the Tree of Life

In this episode of Hebrew Voices, A Geneticist's Perspective on the Tree of Life, Nehemia Gordon talks with Dawn Irion who studied genetics research and went from believing in evolution to creation science, about her perspective on the Tree of Life.

I look forward to reading your comments!

Podcast Version Download Audio Transcript

Hebrew Voices #88 - A Geneticist's Perspective on the Tree of Life

You are listening to Hebrew Voices with Nehemia Gordon. Thank you for supporting Nehemia Gordon's Makor Hebrew Foundation. Learn more at NehemiasWall.com.

Nehemia: This is one of the things I love about you, and I love about people in general, who are listening to my teachings, is they’re following what I’m actually saying is, “Don’t take my word for it. Go check for yourself and explore different possibilities.” So, you were sharing with me how there was point in this study, I don’t know if it was this actual point but it was an important point, that you disagreed with. And you had a really good perspective I want you to share it with the people.

Benjamin Netanyahu: Le ma’an Zion lo ekhesheh, u’l’ma’an Yerushalayim lo eshkot. (For Zion’s sake I will not be silent, and for Jerusalem’s sake I will not rest. Isaiah 62:1)

Nehemia: Shalom guys. I'm here with Dawn Irion, who is involved in searching for the Name in these Hebrew manuscripts. And she is now gonna talk to us about her favorite episode of Hebrew Voices. Shalom, Dawn.

Dawn: Shalom, Nehemia. Thanks for having me on today.

Nehemia: Dawn, what's your favorite Hebrew Voices? And then we're going to hear about the support team study.

Dawn: Okay, so my favorite Hebrew Voices has got to be “Saving Faith,” because of all your Hebrew Voices, that's the one that resonated most with me personally. Because I feel like my story is very similar to Mark's story, where I came out of Christian church and started keeping Torah, started testing and questioning everything that I had believed. And honestly, I'm super thankful for finding you and finding your “Torah Pearls” studies and helping me go through the Torah and understanding it from a Hebrew perspective.

Because when you come from my tradition, you have a very Greek mindset, and everything has to fit, and everything needs to check the box, one thing after another, very linear. And you can't really approach the Scriptures that way. And so, I'm really thankful for you. I feel like Yehovah led me to your studies to help me through that process and kept me away from a lot of bad teachings that are out there and protected me with some really good teachings. So, thank you, Nehemia.

Nehemia: And guys, for those who haven't seen it, “Saving Faith” is an episode I did with Dr. Mark, who was a medical doctor, but also a person with a degree in Christian theology, as he was having struggles with his faith. And he asked me one day, he said, “Nehemia, if you had to defend the faith in Yeshua, what would your arguments be on these particular types of issues?” And I gave my answer, and he told me later that actually is the reason that today he believes in Yeshua.

And I thought, “Wow, okay.” You know, a lot of times I'm accused that I'm secretly holding people in the back rooms and getting them to deny Yeshua, running secret meetings. Well, Keith makes the joke, he says, “What is Nehemia working on, the 20-year plan? He's never sprung it on me.” And here's an example of an actual meeting I had in private in someone's home, and it was the exact opposite of what I'm accused of. I wanted to share that with people, and I also thought it was an important principle in at least one way of understanding the New Testament.

Dawn: Right, and you bring out that there was a method of interpretation called the “pesher method” that was used. You explain it far better than I ever could in the Hebrew Voices with Dr. Mark. But that concept, I think, is absolutely critical for believers in Yeshua to understand the New Testament.

Nehemia: And by the way, I have a few other episodes about that. One is a support team study where I go into much more depth, that's Pesher and the Dead Sea Scrolls. And the other episode is one I did with AJ, which is called something about reading the New Testament, I forget the name of it, guys, but you can find it. It's one of the episodes I do with AJ Barnard.

Dawn: And also, your interview with Dr. Blizzard.

Nehemia: Yeah, we talked about it there.

Dawn: “Understanding the Difficult Words of Yeshua.” That's a great one.

Nehemia: Yeah, that's a really good one. Oh, so the one I did with AJ is called something like, “How the New Testament interprets the Tanakh.” So, those are some episodes where you guys can learn more about that. Tell us about your favorite support team study this year.

Dawn: So, that has got to be “Original Sin and the Tree of Life.” In that one you cover Adam's choice in the garden, Eve's choice, too, and what happened after that. And you tie that into the Torah being a tree of life, and you also cover the resurrection in the Tanakh. And this is something that me and my husband have spent a lot of time personally studying, and to hear your support team study echo our research was really satisfying.

Nehemia: Yeah, and that's one of the feedbacks we've gotten on this episode, “The Original Sin and the Tree of Life,” especially from people who are coming from a New Testament perspective. They're saying, “Wow, we didn't know there was a concept of resurrection in the Tanakh.” Definitely, for most Jews, that is considered one of the principles of faith, even though there have been Jews throughout history who doubted that principle, generally interpreted those passages allegorically as referring to the national resurrection of Israel. But most Jews have taken them relatively literally, as a physical resurrection in the end times, which corresponds with the final judgement. I actually talk about that in my book, “Shattering the Conspiracy of Silence,” as well. Now, I'm sure that everything, all of my teachings, you agree with 100 percent, right, Dawn? That I am your preacher and you obey everything I say, is that right? Or am I wrong?

Dawn: I'm sorry, Nehemia, you're wrong.

Nehemia: You've broken my heart. No, no. This is one of the things I love about you, and love about people in general who are listening to my teachings, is they're following what I'm actually saying is, “Don't take my word for it. Go check for yourself and explore different possibilities.” So, you were sharing with me how there was a point in this study, I don't think it was a central point, but it was an important point that you disagreed with and you had a really good perspective. I want you to share it with the people.

Dawn: All right, so I did agree with 99 percent of your support team study, because it echoed the research that we had done. However, coming from my background in genetic research, I have a very different perspective on the tree of life.

Nehemia: Before you get to that, can you tell people what you told me recently about the whole issue of evolution, and how you changed on that view? We gotta do an episode one time about that.

Dawn: Yeah, I was in genetic research. I was a scientist at the University of California, and I believed in evolution. I published based on my belief in evolution. And when I retired from that to be a full-time mom, I started studying creation science. I learned more after leaving the university about genetics than I learned while I was there. And understanding the genetic, not just the coding, but the processes that go into reading DNA, make evolution simply impossible.

Nehemia: Say that again. I want you to repeat that.

Dawn: Okay, not just the coding of your DNA, but all the mechanisms involved in reading and making proteins out of your DNA, all of those mechanics, the complications involved in all of that, evolution simply cannot explain how that came to be. With that, evolution is impossible.

Nehemia: Is that the principle of irreducible complexity? Is that one of the concepts that we're talking about? Like you have the little guy with tail motor, and if you take off one piece, it stops working? The bacterial flagellum, is that what you're talking about?

Dawn: I wouldn't put it that way. The analogy I like to give is, say you have a blueprint for a car manufacturer facility. You have a blueprint for something that will produce a car. That's DNA. Just having the blueprint doesn't get you anywhere. You need to have a blueprint for the building. You need to have a blueprint for the robots. You need to have a blueprint for all the little things that make up a car. So, how are you gonna get from having a blueprint to have all of those mechanisms in place that are required to replicate that blueprint?

Nehemia: So, you as a biologist came to this conclusion that evolution is impossible. I love the way your brain works. Now, let's go back to original sin and the tree of life. You had this wonderful insight I want you to share with the people.

Dawn: Okay, so based on my understanding of genetics, the reason we age and get old and die is because when our cells replicate DNA, damage occurs, or errors occur in the code, and they accumulate over time. So, when we're developing in adolescence, our DNA repair mechanisms are super-efficient, and they're doing their job. So, cells are replicating, and they're being replicated faithfully. And errors are being corrected if they occur, because errors occur in your DNA all the time. It's just part of the process.

There are mechanisms that come along behind, and if it catches a repair, it repairs it. But as you age, those repair mechanisms don't work so well anymore. And over time, you accumulate damage in your cells, and you get old and die. Well, my concept of the tree of life is that in some way, it provided reparative resources to Adam's body so that whatever damage had occurred, it could go in and repair that damage, or prevent that damage from occurring. My comment on the tree of life is that it's not a once and done thing. Adam would have had to have continual access to the tree of life in order to live. Once he's lost that access, that's the day he began to die.

Nehemia: Wow. I've heard this concept before, because it comes from Ezekiel. I want to read the verse for people. Ezekiel 47:12 is speaking about the end times, and it says, “On the banks on both sides of the river…” And this is a river that comes out of the Temple, “there will grow all kinds of trees for food. Their leaves will not wither, nor their fruit fail, but they will bear fresh fruit every month, because the water for them flows from the Sanctuary. Their fruit will be for food and their leaves for healing.” This is describing the end times.

We have this idea that in the end times we're going to have eternal life. That's from Daniel 12, for example. Guys who listen to the study, I talked about that. We have this idea of eternal life. Well, why do we need these for healing if we have eternal life? And so, there's definitely this concept, no question about it, in the Tanakh that there's a tree of life that you continually eat from. And you had pointed to a verse in Revelation, which I hadn't really thought about, Revelation 22:2. Can you read us that verse?

Dawn: Right, and this is post-new Jerusalem. This is post-resurrection, post-Judgment Day. And it says, Revelation 22:2, “Between the main street and the river was the tree of life, producing 12 kinds of fruit, a different kind every month. And the leaves of the tree were for healing of the nations, or healing the nation.”

Nehemia: Right, so there's no question that Ezekiel 47 is being referenced there, or the same concept, in Revelation 22.

Dawn: Right.

Nehemia: And the point is that there's two ways of looking at the tree of life. And the way I presented it in the study is that you eat once from this tree, and you live forever. And then, the Torah comes as a way of eating once again from that tree of life. But if you think about it, the Torah isn't something like, “I kept the Torah once, now I'm done. Now I could live my life as it is.” No, it's an ongoing thing where it constantly sustains me.

I love that image, so I think you might have convinced me here. There's definitely something to think about. And this is one of the things that I encourage people to do is, don't just blindly accept everything I say, but go and think for yourselves. Hear what I have to say and explore the Scriptures, and find out for yourselves. And in this case, you explored the Scriptures and you raised this possibility, which I had considered, but I kind of sidelined it. But you raised a really good point. What I love about this is it kind of echoes a debate that happened much later in Christian history, which was the debate between John Calvin and Arminius. The debate between Calvin and Arminius was over... You know, Calvin had what's called “TULIP,” the five points of reformed theology. And the P stands for Preservation of the saints, which in popular parlance is what people call, “once saved, always saved.” And Arminius said, “No, you're not once saved, always saved. You could be saved and then lose your salvation if you sin, if you do various things.” But if you doubt, I'm not an expert in Armenian theology, guys. Go look it up for yourselves. But the point is, we say in Hebrew, “lehavdil,” to separate completely from what we're saying here from Arminius and John Calvin, but there's an analogy there. There's two ways of looking at the tree of life. You eat from it once and you live forever, or it's an ongoing process.

And definitely, no question, the Torah reflects the ongoing process. It's not that you keep the Torah one time. “I'm now a Torah keeper, I am saved, woo. I'm good and I've got nothing to worry about.” And it's not anything to worry about, actually. It is a blessing, but it’s an ongoing blessing and it takes some discipline, and sometimes we sin, and we have to ask for repentance. And that is something that Jews are constantly doing is asking for repentance, ‘cause we know there's no man alive who doesn't sin. And it really is this concept of this ongoing relationship with God, rather than… And I like to liken it to a wedding, to a marriage.

You get married and then you're done, and you never see your wife again. That's one way of looking at it, because now you're married, right? No, it's an ongoing relationship. Sometimes you mess up. It's a relationship with the Creator of the Universe that you have to maintain over time by being loyal to the Creator of the Universe. And if you sin, He's actually much more forgiving than any spouse. That's the beauty of it. Guys, go listen to my study, “Original Sin and the Tree of Life” support team study, and Hebrew Voices, “Saving Faith.”

Thank you, Dawn, for joining us. Shalom.

Dawn: Shalom, Nehemia.

You have been listening to Hebrew Voices with Nehemia Gordon. Thank you for supporting Nehemia Gordon’s Makor Hebrew Foundation. Learn more at NehemiasWall.com.

We hope the above transcript has proven to be a helpful resource in your study. While much effort has been taken to provide you with this transcript, it should be noted that the text has not been reviewed by the speakers and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. If you would like to support our efforts to transcribe the teachings on NehemiasWall.com, please visit our support page. All donations are tax-deductible (501c3) and help us empower people around the world with the Hebrew sources of their faith!


SUPPORT NEHEMIA'S RESEARCH AND TEACHINGS!
Makor Hebrew Foundation is a 501c3 tax-deductible not for profit organization.

Subscribe to "Nehemia Gordon" on your favorite podcast app!
Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | 
Amazon Music
 | TuneIn
Pocket Casts | Podcast Addict | CastBox | iHeartRadio | Podchaser
 | Pandora

Share this Teaching on Social Media
Related Posts: Saving Faith How the New Testament Interprets the Tanakh Understanding the Difficult Words of Yeshua Original Sin and The Tree of Life Pesher in the Dead Sea Scrolls Hebrew Voices Episodes Support Team Studies Nehemia Gordon's Teachings on the Name of God SHOW NOTES Dawn Irion's Website Verses Mentioned Ezekiel 47:12 Revelation 22:2
  • Marianne Pardoe says:

    Loved her comment she learned more after leaving university. Nehemiah you help us dig deep to know and understand Yehovah. Thank you so much.

  • UKJ says:

    I love the explanation why evolution is impossible! Thank you!

    Of late I have listened to the audio book by Stephen C. Meyer “Signature in the Cell” He goes into great details of why ‘Intelligent design requires an Intelligent Designer ‘

    On the tree of life the following..

    Gen 3:22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

    The way I understand this passage, when Adam took of the wrong tree he had need of the tree of life as something in the wrong tree had introduced a mechanism in his body to change his mortality from one of ‘need not have died’ to one of ‘gradually dying from that moment on’. As it says “The wages of sin is death!” This means that there had been no need to take of the tree of life before sin occurred, (hence the penalty)! In other words, ‘the penalty indicates the state of existence before sin had occurred or happened’.

    In my understanding, the tree of life pictures eternal life to be more than ‘need not die’ to one of ‘cannot die’!

    If Adam had not been prevented from taking of the ‘tree of life’ after the fall, he would have had the status of ‘cannot die’ and this would have had a catastrophic outcome for the human race! Wisdom comes with experience and Adam did not have the wisdom to make the right choice , (as he followed Eve)! This begs the question ‘Do we, as a human race, have the wisdom now?’ I think looking at the state of the world, the answer might be obvious!

    Therefore, Yehovah in HIS wisdom did the following….

    Gen 3:24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

  • jehovajah says:

    ? The tree of life is actually the tree of living things. A tree which fruit generally produces living fruit, so this is a tree which produces living fruit whose purpose Is to bring life to all eat it. We all know that by eating food we maintain our health and our life, but some foods are way better at restoring us to good condition.
    First of all understand that the garden was named for Adam, as it says Yehovah placed Adams name there. Then understand the two instructions that Adam was given, Adam at this stage being a combined being of both male and female entities: Eat and continue to eat of every tree which bears fruit in the garden. And the second instruction was do not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and bad. Because in the day that you eat of that tree you will die. Or rather you are dying and you will imagine dying!.
    How could that be? The answer is by preventing them now both in the form of a male and a female from continuing to eat from the tree of living thing! Nachash certainly did not mention that a possibility to them when he told them about the result of eating the tree of the knowledge of good and bad! As it is said the devil is in the details!

  • Brondwyn Hodge says:

    Bam!!

  • William G.Peter says:

    When the day Adam eat the forbidden fruit he died as he didn’t begin to die when he lost access to the tree of life, even if he didn’t eat the fruit from the tree of life he didn’t die. When we understand the day Adam eat of the forbidden fruit he didn’t die then that’s contrary to the Genesis 2:17.

    Thus, Adam died the same day, however the day of God says that Adam lived 930 years. It’s unfortunate scholars failed to understand the fundamental fact in it.

    When the day Adam eat of the forbidden fruit he died and that’s his Spirit as the breadth of life breated by God into the nostrils of Adam was departed from his physical body, thus he died as this is corresponds to the reality, if anybody died then his Spirit departed from his physical body and that’s how we determine someone died, the same was happened to Adam.

    Now, the question is hos did he live 930 years? he 930 years b/c of the Evil Spirit rooted from the fruit of the knowledge of the Good and Evil arrived into his physical body as these two incidents happened in a fraction of time or without a gap of time. Therefore, Adam lived 930 years as a sinner who is dead in the sight of God.

  • Bonnie Kimble says:

    Nehemia
    Once again you have brought to my husband David and I another interview that provokes the mind and spirit. We feel such joy in the interviews, your journey and that you are willing to share that journey into a deeper understanding of the Bible from a Hebrew perspective. You have blessed us with your sharing the past 1 1/2 years.

    So many of us are being called out of the church and Messianic congregations hungering for truth and deep study of the scriptures from a Hebrew perspective without the rabbinic traditions. We were called out 17 years ago. We, like so many, do not have a community close by to study with. When hearing people like Dawn share, It helps us to know we are not alone.

    Thank you Dawn for sharing briefly your journey! There are many Creation Science books out there that give evidences of Yehovah’s perfect designs. ‘Censored Science’ & ‘Have You Considered’ by Bruce Malone and ‘A Closer Look at the Evidence’ by Richard & Tina Kleiss are all collections from several science fields and authors that we highly recommend, though each share a bit from a Christian perspective. Shalom

  • Neville Newman says:

    Hello Scott,
    Why would it be “absurd to conclude the tree of “life” could have “died” ” ? Why would that be any more or less absurd than the entire rest of the creation, which we accept as miraculous?

  • Thank you for always posting thought provoking videos.
    The Table we have available to us is stunning, luxurious and never fails to satisfy.
    I do love that the Words are Life Bringers, Life changers and always leave us desiring more.
    Psalm 103: He fills my mouth with “good” so that my Youth is renewed like the eagles…The Fountain of Youth …Praise and Adoration.

  • UKJ says:

    A Genetics Perspective on the Tree of Life

    The garden of Eden: Adam and Eve had not eaten of the fruit of the tree of life , neither does it mention of any leaves for the maintenance of their physical bodies. In fact they need not have died , despite the lack of such information, as the penalty of death does not depend on such!

    The penalty of death dependency had been “Do Not eat of the tree in the midst of the garden” This eating of this fruit brought them death! Would it be inconceivable to think that somethings had changed in the D N A of their body to bring about the eventual death of their physical body by eating this fruit ??

    Hence therefore the need for redemption ? Would this redemption then not include a Redeemer and as such not so much on a reliance on leaves for redemption, but rather on the person ?

    If it is so easy to redeem the physical body to eternal life, why would Isaac have not been able to be the one to bring the healing to his descendants? In those days the law had not been given as a binding contract…

    All it would take now is to do away with the law’s of Yehovah?

    There seems to be a breach (in my way of working things out), and this breach can only be healed by a Redeemer who has/had the power to overcome that which has been breached.

    The gift of eternal life seems to entail more than the sustaining of the physical body to an eternal state of being, as it had been for Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden, but rather the taking of the fruit of the tree of life, which seems to include more than just that…

  • Susan Lein says:

    Thank you for this program!! I loved hearing Dawn’s perspective on the tree, such a cool way to look at it! And I really appreciated Dawn’s story — I’d love to hear more about her and her insights into Creation Science! As a Pd.D. physicist who quit academia to be a mother and then was called by Yehovah to follow Torah and also get super interested in Creation Science and feel like I understand the universe and science way more NOW than when I was in school … I was like, “Wow! Dawn! You too?? How many of us are there??” Yehovah is doing such cool things right now and weaving together a beautiful pattern!

  • Scott Nelson says:

    That one would need to continue eating from the tree of life to sustain eternal life is an interesting theory. There are those parallels to observing Torah whereby one needs to continue in obedience as Nehemiah says, but there are also parallels to once-and-done. Yeshua spoke of “living water” to the woman at the well. Once one drinks of this water, it becomes in a person “a fountain of water springing up into everlasting life.” John 4:14 Here, the life sustaining force appears to be perpetual! I would lean toward believing the effect of eating from the tree of life is similarly perpetual.
    The question that really intrigues me is this: Since it would be absurd to conclude the tree of “life” could have “died”, one has to ask, what ever happened to it? If Yehovah took it to heaven, then one must ask: If taking the tree of life to heaven had been an option, why didn’t Yehovah take it to heaven in the first place to keep it out of Adam’s reach? Why go through all the trouble of stationing Seraphim and a blazing sword to block Adam’s access to it? This line of logic compels me to conclude the tree of life had to stay on earth for a very important reason. Too much to get into here, but Yeshua clearly indicated that the tree of life and the “Garden of God”, (Eden) were still here somewhere!!! He said; “To him who overcomes I will give to eat from the tree of life, which is in the midst of the Garden of God.” Revelation 2:7 The Greek word translated “garden” in the NAB is accurate. See Ezekiel 28:13 for proof that Eden is the Garden of God!

  • Aron Brackeen says:

    Yes, as evolution is generally and specifically understood/believed, Dawn is correct–it is impossible. (TY Dawn.) Nehemia’s “irreducible complexity” is a key concept in Creation understanding. I agree with the on-going nature of Torah observance–Tree of Life–as discussed.

    However, Revelation 22 is the same content in Ezekiel 47, as in the same time frame of Messiah’s Kingdom. Dawn understandably conveys the popular perspective about Rev. 22 being after all things (i.e., Messiah’s Kingdom, Judgment Day). I too held that perspective until continued OT-NT comparisons of similar End-of-Days content convinced me (and others) that Rev. 22 is best understood as being the Kingdom of Heaven/God on earth which is Messiah’s Kingdom. That is, Rev. 21-22/Ezk 47 starts Messiah’s Kingdom.

    To help one understand that perceptive–how Rev. 21-22/Ezk.47 is not after the millennial reign of Messiah but rather starts and continues during it–consider Genesis ch. 1 and ch. 2 (often used to discredit Moses’s writings about the beginning, due to a different order of events between the two chapters). There’s no contraction. A person should understand how the view changes between ch. 1 and 2. Ch.1 is ‘everything’ over Days 1-6 like a general overview. Then follows Ch. 2 detailing Day 6 in the Garden particularly, thus a different order of events in the Garden’s detail ‘different’ from the Creation overview (ch. 1). Thus, Ch.1 is overview…the big picture, and ch 2. is a smaller, detailed view of the Garden–all in six days as written. Thus, there’s no problem for YeHoVaH to renovate the destroyed earth still to occur (after 2018) and to begin Messiah’s Kingdom.

    Now consider Revelation’s 20 (as Gen. 1-overview) and 21-22 (as Gen. 2-detail). As for Rev. 21-22 being nothing different than the Prophets of Old: Compare it to Isa. 60, Zech. 14, Isa. 2 (and Rev. 21:7 w/ Ezk. 44:9, Isa 52:1). Many more passages will be noticed along the way. It’s going to be GREAT!

    • Dawn Erickson Irion says:

      Thanks for commenting Aron. You could very well be right and it would also explain how we can live for 1000 years during the millennium.

    • UKJ says:

      Thank you Aaron! I too understand things to be that way….!